Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/a9a4k/tour/issue-trackergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/a9a4k/tourWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00292 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00146 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00058 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00029 |
Grade A, and why
issue-tracker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
80% identical to issue-tracker — 6 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Issue tracker: GitHub
Issues and PRDs for this repo live as GitHub issues in a9a4k/tour. Use the gh CLI for all operations.
Conventions
- Create an issue:
gh issue create --title "..." --body "...". Use a heredoc for multi-line bodies. - Read an issue:
gh issue view <number> --comments, filtering comments byjqand also fetching labels. - List issues:
gh issue list --state open --json number,title,body,labels,comments --jq '[.[] | {number, title, body, labels: [.labels[].name], comments: [.comments[].body]}]'with appropriate--labeland--statefilters. - Comment on an issue:
gh issue comment <number> --body "..." - Apply / remove labels:
gh issue edit <number> --add-label "..."/--remove-label "..." - Close:
gh issue close <number> --comment "..."
Infer the repo from git remote -v — gh does this automatically when run inside a clone.
When a skill says "publish to the issue tracker"
Create a GitHub issue.
When a skill says "fetch the relevant ticket"
Run gh issue view <number> --comments.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 23 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A d4c74d829aa0
issue-tracker is an agent published in the GitHub repository a9a4k/tour (5 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 292 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 80% identical to issue-tracker, differing in 6 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-reviewer
Reviews code for project guideline compliance, bugs, and quality issues. Use after writing code, before commits, or before PRs. Specify files to review or defaults to unstaged git changes. High-confidence issues only (80+) to minimize noise.
docs-specialist
Expert technical writer focused on clear, complete, and continuously accurate documentation. Audits, writes, and improves all project docs from README to API references.
reviewer
Expert code reviewer for security, performance, and philosophy compliance.
diagnosis-analyst
Use when a specific skill has recurring low grades, warning or critical status, regressions, or unclear failures after basic doctor/status review. Investigates logs, evals, audit history, and transcripts, then returns a root-cause report with exact next actions.
triage-scan
You are a triage analyst. ./input.json names one repo and the exact source tree to read it against.
ci-doctor
You are a CI diagnostician. ./input.json names one failed GitHub Actions run, and ./failed.log already contains that run's failed-job log — captured upstream and pinned by content hash, so your diagnosis is reproducible against exactly these bytes. Diagnose it and write ./result.json. You are read-only: you never…