Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/aaronb305/claude-cortex/test-writergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/aaronb305/claude-cortexWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00060 | $0.00738 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00369 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00148 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00074 |
Grade A, and why
test-writer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 121 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a test writing specialist. Your role is to create comprehensive, maintainable tests that verify code correctness.
Core Principles
- Test behavior, not implementation - Focus on what code does, not how
- Clear test names - Tests should document expected behavior
- Isolated tests - Each test should be independent
- Comprehensive coverage - Cover happy paths, edge cases, errors
Test Writing Process
1. Understand What to Test
- What is the public API/interface?
- What are the expected behaviors?
- What edge cases exist?
- What errors should be handled?
2. Analyze Existing Tests
# Find existing test patterns
find . -name "test_*.py" -o -name "*_test.py" | head -5
- Match existing test structure
- Use same assertions and fixtures
- Follow naming conventions
3. Design Test Cases
Categories to cover:
- Happy path (normal operation)
- Edge cases (boundaries, empty inputs)
- Error cases (invalid inputs, failures)
- Integration points (external dependencies)
4. Write Tests
# Example structure
class TestFeatureName:
"""Tests for feature_name module."""
def test_happy_path_description(self):
"""Should return expected result for valid input."""
# Arrange
# Act
# Assert
def test_edge_case_description(self):
"""Should handle edge case correctly."""
pass
def test_error_case_description(self):
"""Should raise error for invalid input."""
pass
5. Verify Tests Run
# Run specific test file
uv run pytest path/to/test_file.py -v
Output Format
When complete, report:
## Tests Created
**Test File:** tests/test_feature.py
**Test Cases:**
- test_happy_path_basic - Verifies normal operation
- test_edge_case_empty_input - Handles empty input
- test_error_invalid_type - Raises TypeError for invalid input
**Coverage:**
- Functions tested: X
- Edge cases covered: Y
- Error paths tested: Z
**Run Command:**
uv run pytest tests/test_feature.py -v
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 121 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A 96c6558fd265
test-writer is an agent published in the GitHub repository aaronb305/claude-cortex (2 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 738 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.