Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/ajipurn/fida/issue-trackergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ajipurn/fidaWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00538 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00269 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00108 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00054 |
Grade A, and why
issue-tracker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- issue-tracker — 94% identical, 6 lines differ
- issue-tracker — 91% identical, 4 lines differ
What it actually says
Issue tracker: GitHub
Issues and PRDs for this repo live as GitHub issues. Use the gh CLI for all operations.
Conventions
- Create an issue:
gh issue create --title "..." --body "...". Use a heredoc for multi-line bodies. - Read an issue:
gh issue view <number> --comments, filtering comments byjqand also fetching labels. - List issues:
gh issue list --state open --json number,title,body,labels,comments --jq '[.[] | {number, title, body, labels: [.labels[].name], comments: [.comments[].body]}]'with appropriate--labeland--statefilters. - Comment on an issue:
gh issue comment <number> --body "..." - Apply / remove labels:
gh issue edit <number> --add-label "..."/--remove-label "..." - Close:
gh issue close <number> --comment "..."
Infer the repo from git remote -v — gh does this automatically when run inside a clone.
Pull requests as a triage surface
PRs as a request surface: no. (Set to yes if this repo treats external PRs as feature requests; /triage reads this flag.)
When set to yes, PRs run through the same labels and states as issues, using the gh pr equivalents:
- Read a PR:
gh pr view <number> --commentsandgh pr diff <number>for the diff. - List external PRs for triage:
gh pr list --state open --json number,title,body,labels,author,authorAssociation,commentsthen keep onlyauthorAssociationofCONTRIBUTOR,FIRST_TIME_CONTRIBUTOR, orNONE(dropOWNER/MEMBER/COLLABORATOR). - Comment / label / close:
gh pr comment,gh pr edit --add-label/--remove-label,gh pr close.
GitHub shares one number space across issues and PRs, so a bare #42 may be either — resolve with gh pr view 42 and fall back to gh issue view 42.
When a skill says "publish to the issue tracker"
Create a GitHub issue.
When a skill says "fetch the relevant ticket"
Run gh issue view <number> --comments.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 35 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 1e7ac76d3dd7
issue-tracker is an agent published in the GitHub repository ajipurn/fida (18 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 538 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Writing Reviewer
Reviews academic prose for clarity, argument structure, and voice consistency.
chorus-task-reviewer
Review submitted Chorus tasks — verify implementation against AC and proposal documents. Spawn via the blocking subagent tool after chorussubmitforverify.
task-reviewer
Review submitted Chorus tasks — verify implementation against AC and proposal documents. Spawn after chorussubmitforverify.
retro
Engineering retrospective — analyzes commit history, work patterns, code quality metrics. Per-person breakdowns, shipping streaks, actionable improvements. READ-ONLY, never modifies code.
analyst
Deep synthesis, trend analysis, sprint metrics, decision audits, and trend analysis. Use for cross-project insights, pattern recognition, and strategic recommendations.
claude-deep-review
Internal Claude subagent for deep code review — security vulnerabilities, bug detection, and performance analysis. Has native codebase access (Read, Grep, Glob, Bash) to trace input paths, follow call chains, profile hot paths, and verify assumptions. Launched automatically by council review workflows — not invoked…