issue-tracker

A repository issue-tracking setup that uses GitHub issues and pull requests to record and manage work. GitHub is a service for hosting code and collaborating on changes.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to create, read, list, label, comment on, or close issues in the configured GitHub repository, and to work with pull requests through the repository’s tracker.
Why use it?
It gives the project one defined place for bugs, requests, discussion, labels, and closures. It also specifies the command-line steps for handling those records.

Agent

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/alvinunreal/oh-my-opencode-slim/issue-tracker
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alvinunreal/oh-my-opencode-slim
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,062 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00000 $0.01062
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.00531
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00212
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00106

Measured yesterday against content hash 72a4395d9105, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

issue-tracker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

docs/agents/issue-tracker.md · 45 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 45 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Issue tracker: GitHub

Issues and PRs for this repo live as GitHub issues. Use the gh CLI for all operations. The project repo is alvinunreal/oh-my-opencode-slim.

Conventions

  • Create an issue: gh issue create --repo alvinunreal/oh-my-opencode-slim --title "..." --body "...". Use a heredoc for multi-line bodies.
  • Read an issue: gh issue view <number> --comments, filtering comments by jq and also fetching labels.
  • List issues: gh issue list --state open --json number,title,body,labels,comments --jq '[.[] | {number, title, body, labels: [.labels[].name], comments: [.comments[].body]}]' with appropriate --label and --state filters.
  • Comment on an issue: gh issue comment --repo alvinunreal/oh-my-opencode-slim <number> --body "..."
  • Apply / remove labels: gh issue edit --repo alvinunreal/oh-my-opencode-slim <number> --add-label "..." / --remove-label "..."
  • Close: gh issue close --repo alvinunreal/oh-my-opencode-slim <number> --comment "..."

Infer the repo from git remote -vgh does this automatically when run inside a clone. Write operations (create / label / comment / close) must target the upstream tracker: pass --repo alvinunreal/oh-my-opencode-slim (or set GH_REPO=alvinunreal/oh-my-opencode-slim). In a fork clone, a bare gh command would mutate your fork instead of the project tracker.

Pull requests as a triage surface

PRs as a request surface: yes. This is an open-source repo; external PRs are feature requests with attached code. They enter the triage queue for category labeling only, not the full state machine. Collaborators' in-flight PRs are excluded by the authorAssociation filter below.

Scope: category labels only. External PRs get a bug or enhancement category label based on the PR description or linked issue. They do not enter the triage state transitions and are never auto-closed during triage.

Guardrails (per council review):

  • Apply only bug or enhancement to PRs. Do not apply state labels (needs-triage, needs-info, ready-for-agent, ready-for-human, wontfix).
  • Never apply good-to-code to PRs — they are already code; the label is noise.
  • Never auto-close external PRs during triage. Closure stays in the review flow / maintainer decision.
  • Filter on authorAssociation, not PR content: keep CONTRIBUTOR / FIRST_TIME_CONTRIBUTOR / FIRST_TIMER / MANNEQUIN / NONE (all non-collaborator associations); drop OWNER / MEMBER / COLLABORATOR.
  • Keep PR triage out of issue metrics — don't mix PR counts into issue triage reporting.

Read the full file on GitHub · 45 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 45 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 72a4395d9105

Subscribe to this mod's changes

issue-tracker is an agent published in the GitHub repository alvinunreal/oh-my-opencode-slim (8,516 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,062 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.