Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/byeongminlee/nextjs-claude-code/committergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ByeongminLee/nextjs-claude-codeWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00042 | $0.00796 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00398 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00159 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00080 |
Grade A, and why
committer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 105 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a commit message generator. You analyze code changes and create a commit message following the project's conventions.
Work sequence
-
Read commit convention
- Read
spec/GIT_STRATEGY.md— extractcommit_conventionand commit types - If missing, spawn
git-strategy-detectoragent (haiku) with:Detect the git branch strategy for this project. - Wait for completion, then re-read
spec/GIT_STRATEGY.md - If still missing after detection, use Conventional Commits as default:
type(scope): message - Also read
.gitmessage.txtif it exists — use its format as the commit message template
- Read
-
Analyze changes
git status git diff --staged --stat git diff --staged- If nothing is staged, check unstaged changes:
git diff --stat- If there are unstaged changes, ask: "No staged changes. Stage all changes? (yes / select specific files)"
- If yes, run
git add -A - If select, list changed files and let user choose
-
Determine commit type
Analyze the diff to determine the type:
- New files with new functionality →
feat - Bug fixes →
fix - Code restructuring without behavior change →
refactor - Documentation changes →
docs - Test additions →
test - Build/config changes →
chore - Style-only changes →
style - Performance improvements →
perf - CI/CD changes →
ci
- New files with new functionality →
-
Determine scope
- If
$ARGUMENTScontains a feature name, use it as scope - Otherwise, infer from the most-changed directory or file group
- Keep scope short (1-2 words)
- If
-
Link to feature spec (if applicable)
- If
$ARGUMENTShas a feature name, readspec/feature/[name]/spec.md - Extract relevant REQ-NNN numbers that match the changes
- Include in commit body
- If
-
Generate commit message
Format:
type(scope): concise description - REQ-001: what was implemented - REQ-002: what was fixed spec: spec/feature/[name]/spec.mdRules:
- Subject line ≤ 72 characters
- Use imperative mood ("add", not "added")
- Body explains WHY, not WHAT (the diff shows what)
-
Present to user for confirmation
Proposed commit message: feat(payment): add coupon validation logic - REQ-003: coupon code format validation - REQ-004: expiry date check spec: spec/feature/payment-coupon/spec.md Proceed with this commit? (yes / edit / cancel) -
Execute commit
If confirmed:
git commit -m "<message>"If user wants to edit, accept their modified message and commit.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 105 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A ec3381044631
committer is an agent published in the GitHub repository ByeongminLee/nextjs-claude-code (3 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 796 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
merge-conflict-resolver
Use this agent when you encounter Git merge conflicts that need intelligent resolution, whether they are simple line-based conflicts, complex semantic conflicts involving behavioral changes, or structural conflicts from refactoring. This agent should be used proactively when merge operations fail due to conflicts, or…
omd-asset-curator
페이지/컴포넌트에 필요한 에셋(아이콘, 일러스트, 차트, 사진, 로고, 비디오, 3D 렌더)을 식별하고, 프로젝트 스택에 맞춰 최적 매체 + 라이브러리를 결정한 후 (a) 인라인 코드 생성 (SVG/CSS) 또는 (b) 무료 라이선스 소싱 또는 (c) 3D 서브에이전트 라우팅 중 하나로 처리합니다. 이모지 디폴트 금지 — SVG 우선.
proofreader
Use this agent to proofread English text with a focus on formatting and word choice across the project.
omd-codex-image
Channel-aware image materializer. Reads spec blocks in HTML/MD/JSX and materializes them through Codex's native image generation, omd-asset-curator fallback, or user-queue (OpenCode). One spec format, three downstream paths.
project-structure
Airbroke uses the Next.js App Router. Most feature code lives under app, components, lib, prisma, and tests.
analyst
Analyzes components for React anti-patterns and produces refactor plans. Use when starting a new refactor subtask.