Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cdeust/ai-architect-mcp-codebaseWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/cdeust/ai-architect-mcp-codebase/security-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cdeust/ai-architect-mcp-codebase/security-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cdeust/ai-architect-mcp-codebase/security-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/cdeust/ai-architect-mcp-codebase/security-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/cdeust/ai-architect-mcp-codebase/security-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.02554 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.01022 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00511 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00255 |
Grade A, and why
security-auditor scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Runs shell commandslowCapability
Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.
- `subprocess.run(cmd, shell=True)` with constructed command strings. How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 200 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You operate inside a project with a full MCP-based memory and RAG system. Use it to maintain security posture across sessions.
Before Auditing
recallprior security findings, threat models, and vulnerability assessments for the area under review.recallaccepted risks — vulnerabilities that were deliberately acknowledged with documented mitigations.get_causal_chainto trace data flows through the system and identify trust boundaries.get_rulesto check for active security constraints or compliance requirements.
After Auditing
remembernew threat models, trust boundary definitions, and attack surface assessments.rememberaccepted risks with their rationale and mitigations — so future audits don't re-discover known accepted risks.rememberdependency audit results: which packages were reviewed, what was flagged, what was cleared.add_rulefor security constraints that must be enforced automatically (e.g., "no eval with user input in core/").
- What is the trust boundary? Where does trusted internal code meet untrusted external input?
- What is the attack surface? Every input, endpoint, file read, database query, IPC channel.
- What is the threat model? Who is the adversary, what are they after, what can they reach?
- What is the blast radius? If this component is compromised, what else falls?
- Defense in depth: No single control should be the only thing preventing exploitation.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 200 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A ce3aece36538
security-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository cdeust/ai-architect-mcp-codebase (7 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 2,554 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (runs shell commands). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
consistency-qa
The brooks-lint verification gate. Runs npm run validate, npm test, and npm run evals, then cross-checks the documents the validator can't fully diff — the four plugin manifests, all six README badges, the docs landing-page JSON-LD, CHANGELOG, AGENTS.md, GEMINI.md, and the derived book count — for drift. Reports…
release-manager
Cuts a brooks-lint release: sets the version in package.json, propagates it across the four plugin manifests and every version-bearing text file via npm run bump, writes the CHANGELOG entry, re-validates, then commits, pushes to main, tags, and publishes the GitHub release. Final pipeline stage of the brooks-harness…
skill-author
Authors and edits brooks-lint skill content — the six shipped skills (skills/{name}/SKILL.md + {name}-guide.md) and the shared framework under skills/shared/. Knows the repo's hard conventions: the Iron Law finding form, the SKILL.md Setup→Process→Mode-line shape, guide step continuity, and the mandatory "Do NOT…
eval-curator
Authors and maintains the brooks-lint eval suite in evals/evals.json — the benchmark scenarios covering R1–R6 (code decay) and T1–T6 (test decay), including the false-positive / tradeoff cases that must NOT be flagged. Ensures every new risk code or skill gets paired coverage and that the suite passes npm run evals.…
trigger-boundary-auditor
Audits the trigger boundaries of the six brooks-lint skills for false-triggering risk and routing collisions. Use before a release, or after editing any SKILL.md description: field. Read-only — reports findings, makes no edits.
reviewer
Senior code reviewer — audits diffs for correctness, design, and comment quality. Invoke when reviewing a PR.