testing-agent

An agent for checking software test coverage and compiler health in Foundry or Hardhat projects. Test coverage measures how much code tests exercise; Foundry and Hardhat are tools for building and testing smart contracts.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for running coverage and build checks, matching tests to source contracts, and reporting pass or fail results with coverage figures.
Why use it?
It identifies untested contracts, compiler warnings, and cases where coverage could only be estimated because the normal command failed.

Agent

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/cdsecurity/cdsecurity-skills/testing-agent
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/CDSecurity/cdsecurity-skills
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,215 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00000 $0.01215
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.00607
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00243
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00121

Measured 2d ago against content hash 7a313ebf5567, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

testing-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

audit-prep/references/agents/testing-agent.md · 126 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 126 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Testing Agent — Phases 1 & 2

Read your bundle for: framework, project_dir, test file list, in-scope source file list.

Phase 1: Test Coverage (15%)

Step 1: Run coverage

  • Foundry: forge coverage 2>&1 (timeout 300s)
  • Hardhat: npx hardhat coverage 2>&1 (timeout 300s)

If successful, extract per-contract line and branch coverage percentages. Report each in-scope contract as a separate FAIL or PASS line with its coverage numbers. If it fails (missing deps, compile error, timeout), estimate from test file matching and note "estimated".

Step 2: Match test files to source

Compare in-scope source files against test files. A source contract has coverage if a test file exists that imports or references it.

Step 3: Compiler health

  • Foundry: forge build 2>&1 | grep -ci warning
  • Hardhat: npx hardhat compile 2>&1 | grep -ci warning

Scoring

  • Base score = average branch coverage % (or estimated coverage)
  • If estimated: apply -10 confidence penalty
  • Compiler warnings: -10 each (cap -30) — these MUST be fixed before audit
  • Untested contracts (no matching test file): -15 each (cap -45)

Coverage threshold

After computing score, check: if branch coverage < 90%, emit this FAIL:

FAIL | below_threshold | -0 | n/a
desc: Branch coverage XX% — audit requires minimum 90%
fix: Add tests to reach 90%+ branch coverage before scheduling audit

This is informational (no extra deduction — the low base score already penalizes) but signals the project is NOT audit-ready.

Output:

Report each contract individually, then a total line:

PHASE 1 | Test Coverage | SCORE: 70/100

FAIL | below_threshold | -0 | n/a
desc: Branch coverage 70% — audit requires minimum 90%
fix: Add tests to reach 90%+ branch coverage before scheduling audit

FAIL | contract_coverage | -0 | src/core/Vault.sol
desc: Vault.sol — 45% line, 32% branch
fix: Add tests for deposit(), withdraw(), and edge cases

FAIL | no_coverage | -15 | src/libs/MathLib.sol
desc: No test file for MathLib (5 functions)
fix: Create test/MathLib.t.sol with unit tests

PASS | contract_coverage | src/core/Token.sol
note: Token.sol — 98% line, 95% branch

PASS | contract_coverage | src/core/Oracle.sol
note: Oracle.sol — 100% line, 100% branch

FAIL | compiler_warning | -10 | src/Token.sol:42
desc: Compiler warning: unused variable — must fix before audit
fix: Remove or use the declared variable

PASS | total_coverage
note: Overall: 70% line, 65% branch across 8 contracts

END PHASE 1

Read the full file on GitHub · 126 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 126 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 7a313ebf5567

Subscribe to this mod's changes

testing-agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository CDSecurity/cdsecurity-skills (50 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,215 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

Demonstrate

Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.

microsoft/vscode · 10 tokens

playwright-test-generator

Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.

microsoft/playwright · 151 tokens

.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent

Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.

microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners · 33 tokens

AVM Owner Triage

Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.

github/awesome-copilot · 61 tokens

Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode

Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.

github/awesome-copilot · 11 tokens

code-reviewer

Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.

anthropics/claude-cookbooks · 52 tokens