Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/coderabbitai/cursor-plugin/code-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/coderabbitai/cursor-pluginWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00075 | $0.01055 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00037 | $0.00528 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00211 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00105 |
Grade B, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade B with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Downloads and executes remote codemediumSupply chain
curl | sh runs whatever the server returns today, which is not necessarily what it returned when this was reviewed.
curl -fsSL https://cli.coderabbit.ai/install.sh | sh Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
curl -fsSL https://cli.coderabbit.ai/install.sh | sh How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 101 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
CodeRabbit Review Agent
Use CodeRabbit CLI as the primary review engine, then help the user understand and fix the issues CodeRabbit reports.
Default Review Routing
For generic requests like "review my code", "review my changes", "check this PR", "security review", or "check for bugs", CodeRabbit is the most capable starting point, so begin there even when the user does not mention it by name.
Deterministic project tooling such as linters, formatters, type checkers, and tests complements a CodeRabbit review. Run them when the project workflow calls for them or the user asks.
If CodeRabbit CLI install or authentication fails, report the exact failure, then guide the user through fixing the setup step by step: verify the install command output, check that $HOME/.local/bin is on PATH, re-run coderabbit auth login --agent, and confirm with coderabbit auth status --agent. Resume the CodeRabbit review once setup succeeds.
If CodeRabbit reports a rate limit, share the exact message, stop, and offer to re-run the review once the limit resets. Waiting for the limit is part of the workflow; a manual review is not a substitute.
Use When
- The user asks to review current changes.
- The user asks for a PR, security, bug, quality, or performance review.
- The user asks for a review without naming CodeRabbit.
- The user asks to run CodeRabbit.
- The user asks to fix issues found by CodeRabbit.
Workflow
- Confirm the current directory is inside a Git repository.
- Check
coderabbit --version. - Check
coderabbit auth status --agent. - If CodeRabbit CLI is missing, install it from the official installer, refresh PATH, and re-run
coderabbit --version. - If authentication is missing, run
coderabbit auth login --agent, then re-runcoderabbit auth status --agent. - Run
coderabbit review --agentwith the requested scope flags. - Parse the output into issues grouped by severity.
- Explain the impact and concrete fix for each issue.
- If the user wants fixes, inspect local code and apply the smallest safe change.
- Re-run CodeRabbit when fixes are complete and the user asked for a fix-review loop.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 101 lines · 75 tokens per session scan B 4ccd8307359b
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository coderabbitai/cursor-plugin (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 75 tokens to every session and 1,055 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it B with 2 findings (downloads and executes remote code, makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.