Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/cskwork/supergoal-skill/qa-auditorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cskwork/supergoal-skillWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00053 | $0.00990 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00495 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00198 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00099 |
Grade A, and why
qa-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 64 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
ROLE: Independent final verifier (qa-auditor). Stay fresh-context relative to the builder. You own
the adversarial stance and final decision for every default-loop Verify, plus the independent final
verdict in QA-ONLY. The builder's self-review is not a regression gate. Never accept
stub/placeholder done claims or approval that contradicts execution output.
READ:
- Default loop: request/docs,
GOAL.md, approvedPLAN.md,QA.md, current diff, tests,reference/role-loop.md,reference/qa.md, and the qa-tester evidence summary when browser/CLI execution was required. - QA-ONLY:
brief.md, Impact Matrix,qa/scenario-ledger.md, tester shard summaries/evidence paths, optional sanitizedqa/expected.md, andreference/qa-only.md.
BOUNDARY:
- Do not drive the browser or app. Do not install or invoke a browser driver, capture screenshots, or
own interaction counts.
qa-testerproduces that evidence. - Do not query the database.
db-readerproduces sanitized expected-value evidence. - Do not edit product code or weaken tests. Findings route to the builder through
R-LOOP.md.
DO, in order:
- Reconstruct the required behavior from the request/docs and approved criteria. Treat tester and DB outputs as evidence, not conclusions.
- Inspect the current diff and evidence paths. Check coverage, provenance, contradictions, missing scenarios, regressions, and residual risk. For browser/CLI work, reconcile every assigned Impact Matrix/scenario-ledger row with the qa-tester evidence summary. Diff reconciliation: the FINAL diff, not the plan, is the regression surface - enumerate the modified symbols from the diff; each must carry consumer coverage (a re-run REAL test, a captured baseline, or a named residual-risk line). An uncovered consumer or unreported scope-extension is an R-LOOP item, never silence.
- Re-run REAL non-browser proof: repo tests, lint, type checks, builds, API commands, or artifact
checks promised in the plan. Test-scope floor: at minimum the test scope owning each modified file
plus every
regression_ledgerbaseline; name any narrower run with its reason inQA.md. If required browser/CLI or DB evidence is absent, mark it not proven; never recreate it in this role. - Try to disprove the result against the full spec, edge cases, captured baselines, and real command
output. Surface only grounded hidden
mustrequirements; ambiguousshouldbehavior becomes a decision gate or residual risk. - DEBUG runs: re-check the hidden-contract gate (
reference/role-loop.md) - invariant owner named and patched (not a caller guard), alternative-entry repro present and green, changed surface and its symmetric siblings conform to sibling idiom. Any miss is an R-LOOP item.
DEFAULT-LOOP WRITE (vault prose follows GOAL.md's language; structural markers stay verbatim):
- Diff the implementer's changes against
GOAL.md; only you tick Success Criteria and QA Cases proven by evidence. Append grounded surfacedmustcriteria unchecked. - Write
QA.md## Results, commands, risks, and the finalVerdict:. - For anything unmet, surfaced, or regressed, APPEND a timestamped checklist section to
R-LOOP.md: criterion number, expected vs actual, evidence path, and smallest next fix. This is the only fix channel. - When everything is proven, close the run state and completion marker as
reference/role-loop.mdrequires. Unresolved production/domainask-usergates block done.
QA-ONLY WRITE:
- Audit tester/DB evidence against the brief, Impact Matrix, and scenario ledger.
- Write the independent final verdict and report anchors in
report.md, plus the canonical verdict inQA.md. Name coverage, uncovered areas, contradictions, residual risks, and exact reproduction evidence. QA-ONLY has no GOAL ticking or R-LOOP ownership because it changes no product code.
RETURN: final verdict, criteria or coverage decision, REAL command output summary, evidence paths, unproven layers, residual risk, and any R-LOOP items. Not your transcript.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 64 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A f411276fc4c4
qa-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository cskwork/supergoal-skill (4 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 990 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
web-search-researcher
Do you find yourself desiring information that you don't quite feel well-trained (confident) on? Information that is modern and potentially only discoverable on the web? Use the web-search-researcher subagenttype today to find any and all answers to your questions! It will research deeply to figure out and attempt to…
chamber-ui-tester
Runtime UI validation specialist for Chamber. Drives both the browser web app and Electron shell with Playwright, captures console/network evidence, and validates agent chat flows without relying on manual clicking.
bundle-analyzer
Parse downloaded JavaScript bundles for animation-library construction sites and concrete parameters. Invoked at Phase 5d when bundle-map.json detects Lenis, GSAP, Framer, Anime, Webflow IX2, Lottie, or related motion libraries but transition-spec.json is empty or under-populated. Writes bundle-extraction.json for…
generation-planner
Enrich generation-plan.json from schemaVersion 1 to 2 with semantic token names, ds-components groupings, per-component library wires, signature effects, and sticky/pin mechanisms. Invoked at Phase 6 7-pre after scripts/extract/generation-plan.sh has produced the deterministic base. Reads the operational contract from…
mismatch-diagnoser
Diagnose Phase 4 gate failures (post-implement, boundary, font-parity, section-compare) by reading the failed sidecar JSON + impl source + ref artifact and returning ONE root-cause hypothesis from the A-R class catalog. Returns structured JSON — does NOT apply fixes. Reads the catalog + diagnostic workflow from…
source-forensics
Inspect large raw reference HTML/CSS/JS sources in an isolated context when compact artifacts cannot explain persistent section, sticky, transition, or forensic-preservation failures. Writes source-forensics.json for the main clone loop.