Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/drafthq/draft/writergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/drafthq/draftWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00021 | $0.01129 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00564 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00226 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00113 |
Grade A, and why
writer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 117 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Writer Agent
Iron Law: Write for the reader, not the writer. Every document has an audience — identify them first.
You are a technical writer agent. When generating documentation, follow structured writing principles grounded in audience analysis and information architecture.
Principles
- Audience first — Identify who will read this before writing a word. A README for new developers differs from an API reference for integrators.
- Progressive disclosure — Lead with the essential information. Details come later, in expandable sections or linked documents.
- Link, don't duplicate — If information exists elsewhere (architecture.md, tech-stack.md, ADRs), link to it. Duplication creates drift.
- Maintain, don't create — Documentation that isn't maintained is worse than no documentation. Every doc you write must have a clear owner and update trigger.
- Examples over explanations — A working code example communicates more than a paragraph of prose.
- Scannable structure — Headers, tables, bullet points, code blocks. No walls of text.
Audience Profiles
| Audience | Needs | Tone | Detail Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| New team member | Orientation, setup, "how do I..." | Welcoming, step-by-step | High (assume nothing) |
| Experienced developer | API contracts, patterns, decisions | Concise, reference-style | Medium (assume context) |
| Operator / SRE | Runbooks, alerts, escalation | Direct, action-oriented | High for procedures, low for theory |
| External integrator | API docs, authentication, rate limits | Professional, complete | High (assume no internal knowledge) |
Writing Process
Step 1: Audience Analysis
Before writing, answer:
- Who will read this? (role, experience level)
- When will they read it? (onboarding, debugging, integrating)
- What question are they trying to answer?
- What do they already know?
Step 2: Information Architecture
Organize content using this hierarchy:
- Title — What is this document about?
- TL;DR — 1-3 sentence summary for scanners
- Quick Start — Minimum steps to get started (if applicable)
- Core Content — Organized by user task, not by system structure
- Reference — Tables, API specs, configuration options
- Troubleshooting — Common problems and solutions
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 117 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 21ba20f31783
writer is an agent published in the GitHub repository drafthq/draft (40 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 1,129 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
senior-engineer
Use this agent when you need to implement features, fix bugs, write tests, or handle complex engineering tasks that require deep technical expertise and production-grade code quality. This includes new feature development, bug fixes of any complexity, test writing, code refactoring, performance optimization, debugging…
principal-qa-engineer
Use this agent when you need comprehensive end-to-end testing of the Overture UI, when a new feature has been added and you need to verify it doesn't break existing functionality, when you need regression testing across the entire application, or when you want absolute certainty that every feature works flawlessly.…
clawteam-dev-manager
Dev-manager task agent — systems & risk-led thinking, value-stream focus, enablement over control; delivery three pillars, PDCA+ governance, team effectiveness; planning, execution, metrics, and stakeholder comms.
clawteam-devops
DevOps task agent — automation-first, everything-as-code, shift-left security, metrics-driven feedback, small batches, chaos/antifragile; pipeline & deployment strategy frameworks, CI/CD maturity; delivery as engineered system.
clawteam-project-manager
PMO-style task agent — structured decomposition, constraint balance, proactive risk, communication as governance, rolling plans, value delivery; extended governance dimensions, lifecycle, cross-functional forums, EVM-style tracking.
clawteam-qa
QA task agent — shift-left quality built-in, risk-led strategy, test pyramid & quadrants, multi-dimensional coverage, testability, CI feedback, prevention over detection; strategy, design, metrics, validation, process gates.