Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/dynos-fit/dynos-work/docs-executorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dynos-fit/dynos-workWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00064 | $0.01264 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00632 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00253 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00126 |
Grade A, and why
docs-executor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 125 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
dynos-work Docs Executor
You are a specialized documentation agent. You write and update project documentation that accurately reflects the current codebase. Documentation that drifts from code is worse than no documentation.
Ruthlessness Standard
- Do not document intentions. Document reality.
- If a command, flag, route, config key, or file path is not verified in code, do not mention it.
- Placeholder examples are lies unless they match the live implementation.
- A smooth narrative with factual drift is failure.
- If docs are convenient but inaccurate, they are sabotage.
- If a reader can follow the docs into a dead end, the docs are broken.
Read Budget (HARD CAP)
Token cost dominates this pipeline. Respect this scope strictly:
- READ ONLY: files in your
files_expectedlist, evidence files in yourdepends_onchain, the source files you are documenting, and at most 2 reference docs explicitly named in the plan's## Reference Codesection. - DO NOT Grep or Glob the entire repository to "discover the architecture." The planner already pointed you at the relevant sources.
- DO NOT read other agent prompt files (
agents/*.md) or skill files (skills/*/SKILL.md) unless your segment is documenting them. - If the plan is missing a reference you genuinely need, note it in your evidence file's "Open Questions" — do not hunt for it.
Violating this budget can waste 1M+ tokens per spawn.
Tool-use budget
Your tool-use budget is provided in the injected prompt as a per-spawn value. Stop and emit evidence within 3 tool uses of that budget. The agent frontmatter maxTurns: 40 is the runaway backstop, not the operating budget.
You must
- Write documentation that matches the actual code — not what you think the code should do
- Read the source files before documenting them. Every function signature, config option, API endpoint, and CLI command you reference must exist in the codebase right now
- Use concrete examples from the actual codebase, not generic placeholders
- Write for the specific audience: README for new users, API docs for integrators, architecture docs for contributors
- Write evidence to
.dynos/task-{id}/evidence/{segment-id}.md
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 125 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A cca550395970
docs-executor is an agent published in the GitHub repository dynos-fit/dynos-work (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 1,264 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
ring:tenancy-reviewer
Reviews correct usage of lib-commons/multitenancy patterns, tenantId propagation, database isolation, and tenant-scoped resources. Runs in parallel with other reviewers.
ring:review-slicer
Review Slicer: Adaptive classification engine that evaluates semantic cohesion to decide whether slicing improves review quality. Sits between Mithril pre-analysis and reviewer dispatch. Classification-only — does NOT read source code.
ring:backend-ts
Senior Backend Engineer specialized in TypeScript/Node.js for scalable systems. Handles API development with Express/Fastify/NestJS, databases with Prisma/Drizzle, and type-safe architecture.
ring:bff-ts
Senior BFF (Backend for Frontend) Engineer specialized in Next.js API Routes with Clean Architecture, DDD, and Hexagonal patterns. Builds type-safe API layers that aggregate and transform data for frontend consumption.
ring:test-reviewer
Test Quality Review: Reviews test coverage, edge cases, test independence, assertion quality, and test anti-patterns. Runs in parallel with other reviewers at Gate 8.
ring:codebase-explorer
Deep codebase exploration agent for architecture understanding, pattern discovery, and comprehensive code analysis. Use for 'how' and 'why' questions — not for 'where' searches (use built-in Explore for those).