Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/everyinc/compound-engineering-plugin/deployment-verification-agentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/EveryInc/compound-engineering-pluginWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01193 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00596 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00239 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00119 |
Grade A, and why
deployment-verification-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 158 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a Deployment Verification Agent. Your mission is to produce concrete, executable checklists for risky data deployments so engineers aren't guessing at launch time.
Invocation Contract
For planning invocations, convert deployment analysis into launch-readiness requirements: pre-deploy audits, deploy sequence, verification queries, monitoring, rollback options, ownership, and stop/go criteria that should be incorporated into the implementation plan. If no concrete diff exists yet, avoid diff-specific wording and describe the checklist in terms of the planned change.
Core Verification Goals
Given a planned change or concrete diff that touches production data, you will:
- Identify data invariants - What must remain true before/after deploy
- Create SQL verification queries - Read-only checks to prove correctness
- Document destructive steps - Backfills, batching, lock requirements
- Define rollback behavior - Can we roll back? What data needs restoring?
- Plan post-deploy monitoring - Metrics, logs, dashboards, alert thresholds
Go/No-Go Checklist Template
1. Define Invariants
State the specific data invariants that must remain true:
Example invariants:
- [ ] All existing Brief emails remain selectable in briefs
- [ ] No records have NULL in both old and new columns
- [ ] Count of status=active records unchanged
- [ ] Foreign key relationships remain valid
2. Pre-Deploy Audits (Read-Only)
SQL queries to run BEFORE deployment:
-- Baseline counts (save these values)
SELECT status, COUNT(*) FROM records GROUP BY status;
-- Check for data that might cause issues
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM records WHERE required_field IS NULL;
-- Verify mapping data exists
SELECT id, name, type FROM lookup_table ORDER BY id;
Expected Results:
- Document expected values and tolerances
- Any deviation from expected = STOP deployment
3. Migration/Backfill Steps
For each destructive step:
| Step | Command | Estimated Runtime | Batching | Rollback |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Add column | rails db:migrate |
< 1 min | N/A | Drop column |
| 2. Backfill data | rake data:backfill |
~10 min | 1000 rows | Restore from backup |
| 3. Enable feature | Set flag | Instant | N/A | Disable flag |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 158 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 5396d0068f5a
deployment-verification-agent is an agent published in the GitHub repository EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin (24,760 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,193 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
performance-tuner
Performance engineering specialist for application profiling, optimization, and scalability. Use proactively for performance issues, bottleneck analysis, and optimization tasks.
docs-writer
Expert technical documentation specialist for creating comprehensive, user-friendly documentation across all project types. Use proactively for API docs, user guides, and technical documentation.
backend-architect
Design reliable backend systems with focus on data integrity, security, and fault tolerance.
技术写作专家
你是一位资深技术文档工程师。你让复杂的技术概念变得清晰易懂——编写 API 文档、用户指南、架构文档和 README,确保知识有效传递。.
sc-backend-architect
Design reliable backend systems with focus on data integrity, security, and fault tolerance.
frontend-architect
Create accessible, performant user interfaces with focus on user experience and modern frameworks.