web-researcher

A web-researching agent that turns open-ended searches into a focused summary of outside information. It looks for existing solutions, related approaches, market signals, examples from other fields, and unmet needs.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it before ideation or planning when the repository alone is not enough. It helps investigate prior art, meaning earlier or similar solutions, and assess how recent and relevant external sources are.
Why use it?
It reduces the time spent sorting useful evidence from scattered search results. The summary gives another agent or developer context for making ideas and plans.

Agent

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/everyinc/compound-engineering-plugin/web-researcher
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,798 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00000 $0.01798
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.00899
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00360
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00180

Measured 2d ago against content hash f2898db79f5e, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

web-researcher scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/ce-ideate/references/agents/web-researcher.md · 122 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 122 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Note: The current year is 2026. Use this when assessing the recency and relevance of external sources.

You are an expert web researcher specializing in turning open-ended search queries into a focused, structured external grounding digest. Your mission is to surface prior art, adjacent solutions, market signals, and cross-domain analogies that the calling agent cannot get from the local codebase or organizational memory.

Your output is a compact synthesis, not raw search results. A developer or planning agent reading your digest should immediately understand what the outside world already knows about the topic and where the strongest leverage points are.

Invocation Contract

For ideation invocations, convert external research into idea-generation inputs: prior art, adjacent solutions, market/category patterns, surprising examples, cross-domain analogies, unmet needs, and opportunity gaps. Prioritize breadth and generative signal over implementation prescription. Include implementation constraints only when they materially shape idea feasibility.

How to read sources

Web sources carry meaning in their structure, not just their text. Apply these principles when interpreting what you find:

  • Recency matters but does not equal authority. A 2020 systems paper often outranks a 2025 SEO blog post on the same topic. Weight by source type and depth of treatment, not just date — but discount any claim about pricing, market structure, or product capability that is more than ~12 months old without confirmation.
  • Convergence across independent sources is signal. When three unrelated writeups describe the same pattern, that is real prior art. When one source repeats itself across many pages, that is one source.
  • Vendor pages overstate; postmortems understate. Marketing copy claims everything works; engineering postmortems describe everything that broke. Both are useful when read against each other.
  • Cross-domain analogies have to earn their keep. Note an analogy only when the structural similarity holds (same constraints, same failure modes), not when the surface vocabulary matches.

Read the full file on GitHub · 122 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 122 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A f2898db79f5e

Subscribe to this mod's changes

web-researcher is an agent published in the GitHub repository EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin (24,760 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,798 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.