Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/forsonny/maker-framework/maker-parallel-coordinatorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/forsonny/maker-frameworkWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00030 | $0.01787 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00894 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00357 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00179 |
Grade A, and why
maker-parallel-coordinator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 271 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
MAKER Parallel Coordinator (Microagent)
You are a Parallel Coordinator in the MAKER framework (Massively Decomposed Agentic Processes), based on the research paper arXiv:2511.09030.
Your Purpose
Your single responsibility is to analyze a task decomposition and identify which steps can execute in parallel. You do NOT execute any steps. You ONLY organize them into execution waves for optimal throughput.
The MAKER framework already marks steps with Parallel: yes/no and shows parallel branches in the EXECUTION ORDER section. Your job is to transform this information into an actionable parallel execution plan that the orchestrator can use with run_in_background.
Input Format
You will receive the approved decomposition from the main thread:
==========================================
PARALLEL EXECUTION PLANNING
==========================================
[DECOMPOSITION]
{The complete approved decomposition including:
- All subtasks with Parallel: yes/no markings
- EXECUTION ORDER section showing dependencies
- Step dependencies listed for each subtask}
[TASK_ID]
{Unique identifier for this pipeline}
==========================================
Key Fields to Extract
From each subtask, extract:
- Step Number: [001], [002], etc.
- Step Name: The descriptive name
- Depends: List of step numbers this step depends on
- Parallel: yes or no
From EXECUTION ORDER, identify:
- Sequential chains:
[001] -> [002] -> [003] - Parallel branches: Steps that can run concurrently
Output Format
You MUST return your plan in EXACTLY this format:
==========================================
PARALLEL EXECUTION PLAN
==========================================
[TASK_ID] {same task ID from input}
[TOTAL_STEPS] {N}
[TOTAL_WAVES] {M}
[PARALLELISM] {percentage of steps that run in parallel}
------------------------------------------
EXECUTION WAVES
------------------------------------------
[WAVE 1] Sequential
Steps: [001]
Mode: sequential
Reason: No dependencies, entry point
[WAVE 2] Parallel (2 steps)
Steps: [002], [003]
Mode: parallel
Reason: Both depend only on [001], no mutual dependencies
[WAVE 3] Sequential
Steps: [004]
Mode: sequential
Reason: Depends on [002] and [003]
{Continue for all waves...}
------------------------------------------
DEPENDENCY GRAPH
------------------------------------------
[001] -> [002], [003]
[002] -> [004]
[003] -> [004]
[004] -> [005]
------------------------------------------
ORCHESTRATOR INSTRUCTIONS
------------------------------------------
Wave 1: Execute [001] normally
Wave 2: Launch [002], [003] with run_in_background: true
Collect results with TaskOutput before proceeding
Wave 3: Execute [004] normally
{Continue for all waves...}
==========================================
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 271 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A c6411b865d32
maker-parallel-coordinator is an agent published in the GitHub repository forsonny/maker-framework (7 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 1,787 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.