Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/govza/mlo-mcp/issue-trackergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/govza/mlo-mcpWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00964 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00482 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00193 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00096 |
Grade A, and why
issue-tracker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 56 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Issue tracker: GitHub + local markdown (hybrid)
This repo uses two tiers:
- GitHub Issues (
govza/mlo-mcp, via theghCLI) — the official tracker. Settled, actionable issues live here. - Local markdown under
.scratch/(gitignored) — work-in-progress: draft specs, exploratory ticket breakdowns, and wayfinding efforts that aren't ready to be official.
Rule of thumb: work starts in .scratch/ while it's still being shaped; once an issue is fully specified and worth tracking officially, promote it to a GitHub issue (and note the GitHub number back in the local file, or delete the local file).
GitHub conventions
- Create an issue:
gh issue create --title "..." --body "...". Use a heredoc for multi-line bodies. - Read an issue:
gh issue view <number> --comments, filtering comments byjqand also fetching labels. - List issues:
gh issue list --state open --json number,title,body,labels,comments --jq '[.[] | {number, title, body, labels: [.labels[].name], comments: [.comments[].body]}]'with appropriate--labeland--statefilters. - Comment on an issue:
gh issue comment <number> --body "..." - Apply / remove labels:
gh issue edit <number> --add-label "..."/--remove-label "..." - Close:
gh issue close <number> --comment "..."
Infer the repo from git remote -v — gh does this automatically when run inside a clone.
Local markdown conventions
- One feature per directory:
.scratch/<feature-slug>/ - The spec is
.scratch/<feature-slug>/spec.md - Implementation issues are one file per ticket at
.scratch/<feature-slug>/issues/<NN>-<slug>.md, numbered from01— never a single combined tickets file - Triage state is recorded as a
Status:line near the top of each issue file, using the role strings fromtriage-labels.md - Comments and conversation history append to the bottom of the file under a
## Commentsheading
.scratch/ is gitignored — never commit its contents.
Pull requests as a triage surface
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 56 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 1c0c48def8a7
issue-tracker is an agent published in the GitHub repository govza/mlo-mcp (1 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 964 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Writing Reviewer
Reviews academic prose for clarity, argument structure, and voice consistency.
task-reviewer
Review submitted Chorus tasks — verify implementation against AC and proposal documents. Spawn after chorussubmitforverify.
retro
Engineering retrospective — analyzes commit history, work patterns, code quality metrics. Per-person breakdowns, shipping streaks, actionable improvements. READ-ONLY, never modifies code.
analyst
Deep synthesis, trend analysis, sprint metrics, decision audits, and trend analysis. Use for cross-project insights, pattern recognition, and strategic recommendations.
rest-endpoints
The small, stable slice of the REST API that guides depend on, alongside the primary MCP surface.
claude-deep-review
Internal Claude subagent for deep code review — security vulnerabilities, bug detection, and performance analysis. Has native codebase access (Read, Grep, Glob, Bash) to trace input paths, follow call chains, profile hot paths, and verify assumptions. Launched automatically by council review workflows — not invoked…