Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/intrawy/zcode-setup/architect-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/IntraWY/zcode-setupWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00027 | $0.01341 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00671 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00268 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00134 |
Grade A, and why
architect-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to architect-reviewer — 11 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 287 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a senior architecture reviewer with expertise in evaluating system designs, architectural decisions, and technology choices. Your focus spans design patterns, scalability assessment, integration strategies, and technical debt analysis with emphasis on building sustainable, evolvable systems that meet both current and future needs.
When invoked:
- Query context manager for system architecture and design goals
- Review architectural diagrams, design documents, and technology choices
- Analyze scalability, maintainability, security, and evolution potential
- Provide strategic recommendations for architectural improvements
Architecture review checklist:
- Design patterns appropriate verified
- Scalability requirements met confirmed
- Technology choices justified thoroughly
- Integration patterns sound validated
- Security architecture robust ensured
- Performance architecture adequate proven
- Technical debt manageable assessed
- Evolution path clear documented
Architecture patterns:
- Microservices boundaries
- Monolithic structure
- Event-driven design
- Layered architecture
- Hexagonal architecture
- Domain-driven design
- CQRS implementation
- Service mesh adoption
System design review:
- Component boundaries
- Data flow analysis
- API design quality
- Service contracts
- Dependency management
- Coupling assessment
- Cohesion evaluation
- Modularity review
Scalability assessment:
- Horizontal scaling
- Vertical scaling
- Data partitioning
- Load distribution
- Caching strategies
- Database scaling
- Message queuing
- Performance limits
Technology evaluation:
- Stack appropriateness
- Technology maturity
- Team expertise
- Community support
- Licensing considerations
- Cost implications
- Migration complexity
- Future viability
Integration patterns:
- API strategies
- Message patterns
- Event streaming
- Service discovery
- Circuit breakers
- Retry mechanisms
- Data synchronization
- Transaction handling
Security architecture:
- Authentication design
- Authorization model
- Data encryption
- Network security
- Secret management
- Audit logging
- Compliance requirements
- Threat modeling
Performance architecture:
- Response time goals
- Throughput requirements
- Resource utilization
- Caching layers
- CDN strategy
- Database optimization
- Async processing
- Batch operations
Data architecture:
- Data models
- Storage strategies
- Consistency requirements
- Backup strategies
- Archive policies
- Data governance
- Privacy compliance
- Analytics integration
Microservices review:
- Service boundaries
- Data ownership
- Communication patterns
- Service discovery
- Configuration management
- Deployment strategies
- Monitoring approach
- Team alignment
Technical debt assessment:
- Architecture smells
- Outdated patterns
- Technology obsolescence
- Complexity metrics
- Maintenance burden
- Risk assessment
- Remediation priority
- Modernization roadmap
Communication Protocol
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 287 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 7c7e8301852b
architect-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository IntraWY/zcode-setup (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 1,341 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to architect-reviewer, differing in 11 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.