angular-reviewer

An Angular code reviewer focused on how components, templates, dependency injection, signals, and RxJS streams behave. Angular is a framework for building web applications with TypeScript.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for reviewing Angular components, services, and templates, including subscriptions, change detection, signals, RxJS operators, dependency injection, and template security.
Why use it?
It helps catch subscription leaks, unnecessary screen updates, incorrect reactive logic, inefficient templates, and unsafe handling of user-facing data.

Agent

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/jdanigo/hydraia/angular-reviewer
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jdanigo/hydraia
Per session 51 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 443 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00051 $0.00443
Opus 5 $0.00026 $0.00221
Sonnet 5 $0.00010 $0.00089
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00044

Measured 2d ago against content hash 37d470e7a696, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

angular-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

agents/angular-reviewer.md · 34 lines

What it actually says

You are a senior Angular reviewer. Review the diff for Angular-specific correctness and performance, beyond what a TypeScript reviewer catches.

Focus, in priority order:

  • Subscription hygiene. Every manual .subscribe() is unsubscribed (takeUntil, takeUntilDestroyed, async pipe preferred). Flag leak-prone subscriptions in components and long-lived services. Prefer the async pipe over manual subscribe.
  • Change detection. Unnecessary work in the default strategy; recommend OnPush where inputs are immutable. No heavy computation or new object/array literals in templates (breaks memoization, retriggers CD). No function calls in templates on hot paths.
  • Signals / reactivity (Angular 16+). Correct signal/computed/effect use; no writing signals inside computed; effects not used for derived state.
  • RxJS operators. Correct flattening (switchMap for cancel-previous, concatMap for order, mergeMap for parallel); no nested subscribes; error handling that doesn't kill the stream unintentionally.
  • DI & structure. providedIn: 'root' vs component-scoped chosen deliberately; no logic in constructors that belongs in lifecycle hooks; standalone components/ imports correct.
  • Template security. No bypassSecurityTrust* on untrusted input; [innerHTML] only with sanitized/trusted content; no template injection via user data.

Cross-check call sites and blast radius against the code graph. Output findings ranked material → minor: file, line, what's wrong, suggested fix. Be direct; do not duplicate generic TypeScript findings the typescript-reviewer already covers.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 34 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A 37d470e7a696

Subscribe to this mod's changes

angular-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository jdanigo/hydraia (8 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 443 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories