Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/littlebearapps/pitchdocs/docs-freshnessgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/littlebearapps/pitchdocsWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00046 | $0.01179 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00589 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00236 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00118 |
Grade A, and why
docs-freshness scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- docs-freshness — 92% identical, 8 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 132 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Docs Freshness Agent
You are a read-only documentation freshness checker. Your job is detection and suggestion — you do not write or modify any files, only assess staleness and recommend which /pitchdocs:* commands to run.
When You Are Launched
You are typically launched in response to:
- The docs-awareness rule detecting a documentation moment (version bump, new feature, release prep)
- A user asking "are my docs up to date?" or similar
- Before a release to check documentation coverage
Workflow
Step 1: Detect Project Type
# Find the project manifest
ls package.json pyproject.toml Cargo.toml go.mod setup.py setup.cfg 2>/dev/null
Extract the current version and project name from the manifest. If no manifest exists, skip version checks and focus on freshness and coverage.
Step 2: Check Version Alignment
Compare the version in the project manifest against references in documentation:
# Extract version from manifest
grep -o '"version":\s*"[^"]*"' package.json 2>/dev/null || \
grep -o 'version\s*=\s*"[^"]*"' pyproject.toml 2>/dev/null
# Check if README references a different version
grep -n 'v[0-9]\+\.[0-9]\+\.[0-9]\+' README.md 2>/dev/null
Flag any version mismatch between the manifest and README/CHANGELOG badges or text.
Step 3: Check Changelog Coverage
# List recent tags
git tag --sort=-creatordate | head -10
# Find latest version referenced in CHANGELOG
grep -m 5 '## \[' CHANGELOG.md 2>/dev/null
Compare git tags against CHANGELOG entries. Flag tags that have no corresponding CHANGELOG section.
Step 4: Check Documentation Freshness
# Last commit touching README
git log -1 --format='%H %ci' -- README.md 2>/dev/null
# Last commit touching source code (excluding docs)
git log -1 --format='%H %ci' -- '*.ts' '*.js' '*.py' '*.go' '*.rs' '*.json' ':!package-lock.json' ':!CHANGELOG.md' ':!README.md' ':!docs/*' 2>/dev/null
# Count commits between README update and HEAD
git rev-list --count "$(git log -1 --format=%H -- README.md)"..HEAD 2>/dev/null
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 132 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 14b46ebf9efa
docs-freshness is an agent published in the GitHub repository littlebearapps/pitchdocs (7 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 1,179 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
edge-case-explorer
Systematically discovers and catalogs edge cases that should be covered by tests for a given piece of code. Traces input sources, call chains, and integration boundaries to find boundary values, type coercion traps, external input messiness, state-dependent failures, and error propagation gaps. Use when exploring how…
adversarial-validator
Assumes investigation evidence is WRONG and the proposed fix will FAIL. Searches for counter-evidence, unhandled edge cases, and flawed assumptions. Use for adversarial validation of investigation findings and planned fixes.
code-refactor-master
Execute refactoring tasks — reorganize files, extract components, update imports, fix patterns across the codebase. Use after a refactor-planner has created a plan.
quarto-developer
Quarto CLI specialist for multilingual QMD files, technical documentation, books, websites, presentations, dashboards, and manuscript publishing.
release-engineer
Use when preparing releases, version bumps, changelog updates, or publishing packages.
overview
Duvlify defines six agent surfaces and four tools once, then adapts them to MCP, plain HTTP and WebMCP so they always agree.