Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/morodomi/dev-crew/correctness-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/morodomi/dev-crewWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00295 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00148 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00059 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00030 |
Grade A, and why
correctness-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Focus
Logic errors | Edge cases (null/empty/boundary) | Exception handling
Output
{"blocking_score": 0-100, "issues": [{"severity": "critical|important|optional", "message", "file", "line", "suggestion"}]}
ブロッキングスコア基準
blocking_score: パイプラインをブロックすべき度合い（0 = 問題なし, 100 = ブロック必須） 80-100→BLOCK | 50-79→WARN | 0-49→PASS
Memory
起動時に注入される agent memory（.claude/agent-memory/dev-crew-correctness-reviewer/MEMORY.md）を過去知見として参照のみ行う（Write/Edit は disallowedTools で不可。更新は人間が手動で行う）。
Record 対象（人間が手動記録）: frequent logic error patterns, project-specific edge cases, easily-missed boundary conditions.
Skip: general programming knowledge, individual bug fix details.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 25 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 8da2ab86048e
correctness-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository morodomi/dev-crew (1 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 295 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
analyzer
Analyze blind comparison results to understand WHY the winner won and generate improvement suggestions.
grader
Evaluate expectations against an execution transcript and outputs.
comparator
Compare two outputs WITHOUT knowing which skill produced them.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.