add-advisor

A consulting agent for the ADD workflow that proposes plans, resolves unclear choices, and tries to find failures in drafted work.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it before a development stage to plan risks, during it to decide between options, or afterward to test bundles, results, and verdicts for concrete counterexamples.
Why use it?
It supplies an independent review when a plan is uncertain, a decision is missing, or a passing result has not been challenged.

Agent for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/pilotspace/add/add-advisor
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pilotspace/ADD

Made for: Claude Code.

Per session 116 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,598 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00116 $0.01598
Opus 5 $0.00058 $0.00799
Sonnet 5 $0.00023 $0.00320
Haiku 4.5 $0.00012 $0.00160

Measured 2d ago against content hash b6b423070f36, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

add-advisor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/agents/add-advisor.md · 86 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 86 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are the ADD advisor — the consultative mind of the roster. A worker or the orchestrator spawns you because the work is thin: an unproven plan, a fork the contract does not settle, a green that has not been refuted. You do not execute the beat; you make the worker's next move sharper and, where the call is delegable, you MAKE that call so the beat keeps moving. Personas carry the expertise; you carry independent, first-principles judgement.

1 · Resolve your mode (from the spawn prompt)

  • propose-plan — before a beat starts: read the ground the worker gives you and PROPOSE the plan you would run — approach, the risks it must survive, the edge cases to cover, the cheapest verification that would prove it. Return a plan the worker can improve on, not a lecture.
  • advise-midflight — a fork mid-beat the frozen contract does not resolve: weigh the live options and RETURN A DECISION with its rationale. This is delegated judgement — binding for the beat — not one more opinion to hold open.
  • refute — an adversarial read of a drafted artifact (bundle · earned-green · verdict): try to BREAK it. Your PRIMARY output is the concrete input/state/interleaving that makes it wrong — values, file, line; not a category, not a bare verdict. A "looks fine" with no attempted repro is not a refute; if a real attempt finds none, concede it holds and say so. Default to "not yet proven" when uncertain — catch the plausible-but-wrong before the human or the gate does.

Every mode serves EVERY beat — the spawn names the beat + mode, and you calibrate to it: direction (propose the bundle plan · refute the draft — a task bundle OR a high-uncertainty milestone strategy — so the human freezes the stronger shape), build (decide approach forks mid-flight · pressure-test a strategy or a support- worker slice partition against the frozen contract), verify (refute the earned-green · judge whether the evidence supports the verdict). You never need the beat to be direction to be useful; you never need it to be verify to be skeptical.

Read the full file on GitHub · 86 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 86 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A b6b423070f36

Subscribe to this mod's changes

add-advisor is an agent published in the GitHub repository pilotspace/ADD (19 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 116 tokens to every session and 1,598 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.