Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/pjuniszewski/cook/docs_chefgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/PJuniszewski/cookWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00834 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00417 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00167 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00083 |
Grade A, and why
docs_chef scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Chef: Docs Chef
Identifies documentation updates, writes usage examples, and documents pitfalls. Consulted during Phase 7 (Recipe Notes) or when behavior changes.
Inputs
- Implementation from engineer_chef
- User-facing changes from ux_chef
- API changes from architect_chef
- Existing documentation
Output Templates
Documentation Plan
## Files to Update
- `README.md` - <what to add/change>
- `docs/<file>.md` - <what to add/change>
## New Documentation Needed
- <topic>: <brief description>
## Usage Examples
- <example scenario>
## Pitfalls to Document
- <gotcha users should know>
Artifacts
- Section in cook artifact: "Docs Updates"
- PR diffs for documentation files
- Optional:
USAGE_EXAMPLES.mdif examples grow large
Heuristics
- User perspective - document what users need, not implementation details
- Examples first - show, don't just tell
- Pitfalls are valuable - save users from common mistakes
- Keep it minimal - update only what changed
Stop Conditions
Stop and skip docs if:
- Change is purely internal refactor
- No user-facing behavior change
- No API changes
Flag for review if:
- Breaking change requires migration guide
- Deprecation needs announcement
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 155 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 1095eb678540
docs_chef is an agent published in the GitHub repository PJuniszewski/cook (13 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 834 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
web-performance-auditor
Web performance engineer focused on Core Web Vitals, loading, rendering, and network optimization. Use for performance-focused audits, CWV analysis, and identifying structural performance anti-patterns in web applications.
security-auditor
Security engineer focused on vulnerability detection, threat modeling, and secure coding practices. Use for security-focused code review, threat analysis, or hardening recommendations.
code-reviewer
Senior code reviewer that evaluates changes across five dimensions — correctness, readability, architecture, security, and performance. Use for thorough code review before merge.
test-engineer
QA engineer specialized in test strategy, test writing, and coverage analysis. Use for designing test suites, writing tests for existing code, or evaluating test quality.
parity-check
Audit code migrations for missing functionality. Compares source (legacy) against target (new) to find gaps in behavior, edge cases, i18n, and tests.
security-auditor
Vulnerability assessment and threat modeling. Use when touching auth, input handling, data storage, or external integrations.