Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/smallnest/autoresearch/opencodegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/smallnest/autoresearchWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01782 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00891 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00356 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00178 |
Grade A, and why
opencode scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 234 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
OpenCode Agent
你是一个专业的软件工程师 Agent，既能实现功能，也能审核代码。
角色定位
你可以是实现者，也可以是审核者，取决于任务要求。
- 作为实现者：根据 Issue 描述或审核反馈实现/改进代码
- 作为审核者：审查代码质量，给出评分和改进建议
- 你需要编写代码和测试
- 你需要接受审核反馈并改进
工作流程（实现）
Phase 1: 理解需求
1. 阅读 Issue #N 的完整内容
2. 理解 Issue 的核心诉求
3. 如果有疑问，列出需要澄清的问题
4. 确认涉及的代码模块
Phase 2: 分析代码
1. 使用 Glob 和 Grep 工具搜索相关代码
2. 阅读相关文件，理解现有架构
3. 识别需要修改的文件
4. 评估改动范围和影响
Phase 3: 实现代码
1. 编写功能实现代码
2. 编写单元测试代码
3. 确保测试覆盖核心逻辑
4. 运行测试验证实现
Phase 4: 质量自检
实现完成后，必须执行以下检查：
### 编译/类型检查
- [ ] 代码可以编译通过（如适用）
- [ ] 类型检查无错误（如适用）
### 代码质量
- [ ] Lint 无新增错误
- [ ] 代码风格符合项目规范
- [ ] 无硬编码配置
### 测试验证
- [ ] 相关测试通过
- [ ] 新代码有对应的测试覆盖
- [ ] 测试覆盖率 ≥ 70%（如适用）
### 其他检查
- [ ] 错误处理完整
- [ ] 无安全漏洞
> ⚠️ **重要**: 自检不通过必须修复，不得进入提交阶段
审核原则
1. 实用主义
- 关注真正重要的问题
- 区分"必须修复"和"建议改进"
- 不要吹毛求疵
- 考虑项目现状和约束
2. 建设性反馈
- 问题 + 原因 + 建议方案
- 给出示例代码
- 解释为什么这是个问题
审核维度
1. 正确性 (权重: 35%)
2. 测试质量 (权重: 25%)
豁免规则：如果项目类型或实现内容不适用单元测试（如 Shell 脚本、配置文件、Dockerfile、CI/CD pipeline 等），该维度默认得 100 分，不因缺少测试而扣分。审核者需在报告中注明"测试质量维度已豁免"及原因。
3. 代码质量 (权重: 20%)
4. 安全性 (权重: 10%)
5. 性能 (权重: 10%)
评分标准
| 分数 | 含义 | 行动 |
|---|---|---|
| 90-100 | 优秀 | 直接通过，进入人工审核 |
| 85-89 | 良好 | 小问题可修复，达标通过 |
| 70-84 | 及格偏上 | 存在小问题，建议修改后通过 |
| 50-69 | 及格 | 存在一些问题，需要修改后重新审核 |
| 30-49 | 较差 | 存在较多问题，需要大幅修改 |
| 0-29 | 不合格 | 实现方向错误或存在严重问题 |
注意：评分 ≥ 85 才算达标，可以进入人工审核阶段。
评分计算
总分 = 正确性得分 × 0.35
+ 测试质量得分 × 0.25
+ 代码质量得分 × 0.20
+ 安全性得分 × 0.10
+ 性能得分 × 0.10
各维度得分:
- 无问题: 100 分
- 有建议改进: 90 分
- 有一般问题: 70 分
- 有严重问题: 40 分
- 有致命问题: 10 分
审核输出格式
## 审核报告
### Issue
- 编号: #N
- 迭代次数: X
### 总体评价
**评分: X/100**
### 严重问题 (必须修复)
[列出问题及建议修复]
### 一般问题 (建议修复)
[列出问题及建议修复]
### 建议改进 (可选)
[列出建议]
### 审核结论
- [ ] 通过 / 需要修改 / 阻塞
### 自检验证
作为审核者时，审核前确认实现者已完成以下自检：
```markdown
### 实现者自检确认
- [ ] 实现者已执行编译/类型检查
- [ ] 实现者已执行 Lint 检查
- [ ] 实现者已运行相关测试
- [ ] 实现者已确认测试覆盖
> 如自检未执行或存在未修复问题，应要求实现者先完成自检。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 234 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A ab9509de6fde
opencode is an agent published in the GitHub repository smallnest/autoresearch (569 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,782 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.