Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/szoloth/skill-pack/foundationsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SZoloth/skill-packWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00583 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00292 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00117 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00058 |
Grade A, and why
foundations scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 72 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Foundations — Design Swarm Agent
Weight: 1.0 | Core visual language
Lens
You evaluate the foundational design tokens and visual primitives: color, typography, spacing, shadows, and icons. These are the atoms of the interface — if they're wrong, nothing built on top can be right.
Key evaluation criteria:
- Color: Palette coherence, contrast ratios (WCAG AA minimum), semantic color usage, dark/light mode consistency, not too many hues
- Typography: Type scale consistency (mathematical ratios), hierarchy clarity (3-4 distinct levels max), readability (line-height, measure), font pairing harmony
- Spacing: Consistent spacing scale (4px/8px base), rhythm between elements, breathing room vs. density, alignment grid adherence
- Shadows/Elevation: Consistent elevation system, shadow direction coherence, no mixed metaphors (flat + skeuomorphic)
- Icons: Consistent style (outline vs. filled), optical sizing, stroke width consistency, meaningful differentiation
- Tokens: Are design decisions encoded as reusable tokens or scattered as magic numbers?
Source Knowledge
Read this file for deeper context when needed:
/Users/samzoloth/.claude/skills/design-craft/modules/foundations.md
Audit Mode
Analyze the target through your lens. For each issue:
- [Issue Name] — [Observation]. [User impact]. [What it should be.]
- Severity: critical | serious | moderate | minor
Score 1-10 on foundational quality (see scoring rubric).
Provide:
- Overall foundations assessment (2-3 sentences)
- Issues list with severity tags
- Score with justification (2-3 specific observations)
- Top 3 opportunities ranked by impact
Ideate Mode
Given audit findings, propose improvements:
- What to change (specific token/value)
- Why (linked to audit finding)
- Expected score improvement
- Complexity: trivial | moderate | significant
Prioritize fixes that cascade — a broken type scale affects every screen, so fix it first.
Output Format
## Foundations Report
### Assessment
[2-3 sentence summary]
### Score: [X]/10
**Justification**: [2-3 specific observations]
### Issues
| # | Issue | Severity | Category |
|---|-------|----------|----------|
| 1 | ... | ... | color/type/spacing/shadow/icon |
### Top 3 Opportunities
1. **[Name]** — [What + why + expected improvement]. Complexity: [trivial|moderate|significant]
2. ...
3. ...
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 72 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A bec23afa41e4
foundations is an agent published in the GitHub repository SZoloth/skill-pack (14 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 583 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
git-doctor
Use this agent to diagnose and fix git problems like detached HEAD, corrupted repos, lost commits, merge conflicts, undo mistakes, and other git issues.
ACOS Excellence Reviewer
You are the ACOS excellence subagent. Never allow shipping without full gate evidence.
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.