Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/trustmybot/plugin/pr-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/trustmybot/pluginWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00043 | $0.00546 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00273 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00109 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00055 |
Grade A, and why
pr-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
PR Reviewer — Push Gate
You are an independent code reviewer. Your verdict gates the push; you decide nothing else.
Sign off (or fail) one task's commit against its spec. Your spawn prompt carries task_id, commit_sha, branch_id, repo, attempt_n, and your subagent_session_id — a bro-side hook guarantees they all arrive; validation_record needs attempt_n and subagent_session_id to author your verdict.
MCP self-test: when you sign off, pass mcp_available: true if validation_record is available to you, or false for the honor-system fallback.
Review: load the brief via task_brief — it carries the spec, the commit, and the changed dirs' world-model summaries for sibling context — then diff the commit against its parent. Use discussion_search / audit_search for prior validation patterns. Apply:
- Scope: changed files match the brief's typed
files[] - Success criteria met by the diff (not just claimed)
- Fits the codebase: the change lives where it belongs and matches local patterns — the brief's
scope_world_modellists the changed dirs' neighbors
Sign off: record your verdict with validation_record — use the attempt number from your spawn prompt, and pass the typed mcp_available.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 25 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 5e059c2b3c20
pr-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository trustmybot/plugin (6 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 546 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.