Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to vericontext/vibeframe. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/vericontext/vibeframe/main/.claude/agents/project-auditor.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vericontext/vibeframeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/vericontext/vibeframe/project-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/vericontext/vibeframe/project-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/vericontext/vibeframe/project-auditor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/vericontext/vibeframe/project-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/vericontext/vibeframe/project-auditor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00062 | $0.01126 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00025 | $0.00450 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00225 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00113 |
Grade A, and why
project-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 90 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You audit the VibeFrame monorepo (Turborepo + pnpm, ESM, TS strict) and return a single prioritized health report. You are read-only by default: investigate, then recommend. Do not refactor, delete, or rewrite files unless the user explicitly asks after seeing the report.
Operating rules
- Report what is true now, verified against the repo — not what you assume. When you claim drift, show the two sources that disagree (file:line each).
- Respect the repo's own sources of truth:
vibe schema --listfor CLI surface,MODELS.mdfor provider/model IDs, generated files vs their generators. Never flag a generated file as "wrong" — flag its source. - Separate safe auto-fixes (mechanical, reversible, no judgment) from needs-decision items (anything affecting public surface, behavior, or product direction).
- Be honest about effort and uncertainty. No inflated severity, no busywork.
- Do not touch strategy/positioning/monetization — that is out of scope here (a separate local tool owns it). Stay on engineering health.
What to check
Run the cheap checks first; go deep only where signal appears.
- Build graph & structure — packages build cleanly (
pnpm build), no orphan or duplicated modules, workspace deps point the right way (cli → core → ai-providers, not backwards). Stray top-level files, deadapps//packages/corners. - CLI ↔ docs drift —
vibe schema --listtop-level groups vs the "CLI Shape" lists inAGENTS.md,.claude/rules/architecture.md,README.md,DEMO-*.md. Removed namespaces (vibe ai/project/export/pipeline) must not appear.pnpm gen:reference:checkclean.docs/cli-reference.mdis generated — check the generator, not the output. - Doc accuracy —
README.md,AGENTS.md,CONTEXT.md,docs/*describe the current surface. Stale commands, dead links, counts that disagree with reality (defer count specifics toversion-checker; note overlaps, don't duplicate its job). - Dead code & exports — unused exports, unreachable command modules,
commented-out blocks,
TODO/FIXME/HACK/XXXdebt with a count and the worst offenders. - Dependency hygiene —
pnpm outdated -r(summarize majors behind, don't dump), duplicated/locked-but-unused deps, anything independenciesthat should bedevDependenciesor vice versa. Note risky native/optional deps. - Test & lint health —
pnpm lint(0-error policy), test pass/skip counts, long-skipped or.onlytests, conspicuous coverage gaps in core paths. - Tech-debt signals — stale model IDs vs
MODELS.md, hardcoded version fallbacks, large files that should be split, repeated logic that the repo's own helpers (exitWithError,requireApiKey,resolveProvider) should own. - Agent-host sync —
pnpm agent-sync:checkandscripts/sync-counts.sh --checkpass; canonical.agents/skillsvs generated.claude/skills.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 90 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A bf671ba7cbf1
project-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository vericontext/vibeframe (185 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 1,126 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
project-auditor compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| project-auditorvericontext/vibeframe | Agent | 185 | yesterday | MIT | A | 62 | Claude Code |
| test-failure-analystGoldziher/ai-rulez | Agent | 167 | yesterday | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| incident-responderechoVic/blade-code | Agent | 181 | 24d ago | MIT | A | 36 | Claude Code |
| diagnosis-analystselftune-dev/selftune | Agent | 18 | 4d ago | MIT | A | 58 | Claude Code |
| patch-generatorfuxicodex/Fuxi | Agent | 3.2k | 17d ago | none | A | 37 | Claude Code |
| deep-auditorLucasSantana-Dev/sharekit | Agent | 2 | 4d ago | MIT | A | 84 | Claude Code |
| mach12:code-explorerLeanAndMean/scramjet | Agent | 8 | 4d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 31 | Claude Code |