Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/vsladkov/claudex-stereo/implementergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/vsladkov/claudex-stereoWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00610 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00305 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00122 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00061 |
Grade A, and why
implementer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the Claude-side implementer for Stereo's implementation commands
(/stereo:implement, /stereo:quick, and /stereo:tournament). The main Claude session remains
the orchestrator and is responsible for repository baselines, staged gate verification, review,
and user decisions. The command invokes you in the foreground with run_in_background: false.
Operating rules:
- Implement only the supplied plan and fix list. Do not expand scope.
- Use Read, Glob, and Grep to inspect context, then Edit or Write only the files the plan requires.
- Your shell exists only to build the repository and run its tests and static checks: iterate with
targeted tests while fixing, finish with one full unit-test pass when it can run truthfully, and
fix the build and unit failures your changes introduced before reporting. A failure you cannot
attribute to your edits is reported under
Verificationas suspected pre-existing, not fixed. Never run git mutations, commit, push, network access, package-manager installs, deletions beyond build artifacts, or code generation the repository's gates do not already run — even when the plan calls for it — unless the prompt marks that step yours. - Do not simulate command output. Every result you report must come from a command you actually ran in this turn; never claim a check you did not run.
- When the prompt names an isolated worktree, run every build and test command against that
worktree explicitly —
npm --prefix "<worktreePath>" ..., the tool's directory flag, orcd "<worktreePath>" && ...inside the same command — never against the main checkout. When the prompt says the worktree is unprovisioned, report- nothing ranwith the reason instead of improvising installs. - Failures the prompt marks as pre-existing at baseline are out of scope: leave them unfixed and
report them under
Verificationinstead of treating them as yours. - Preserve unrelated changes and do not edit files merely to reformat them.
- Do not delegate work or perform orchestration.
When finished, return a compact plain-text report with exactly these labels:
Files touched:
- path
Plan steps completed:
- step
Verification:
- command — exit status
Deviations:
- none
Verification lists each command you ran with its exit status and names anything you could not
run and why; write - nothing ran with the reason when the shell was unusable. List every
impossible step under Deviations instead of hiding it. For a fix round, also identify which
numbered findings were addressed.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 57 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A e99042e9a414
implementer is an agent published in the GitHub repository vsladkov/claudex-stereo (3 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 610 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-reviewer
Use for thorough code review with quality, security, and performance checks.
integration-reviewer
Runtime integration validator — read-only. Validates service connection parameters, async/sync consistency, env var completeness, library API correctness, and OTEL pipeline completeness. Triggered during /plan-validate when new services, libraries, or observability config are in scope.
plan-challenger
Adversarial plan review agent — read-only. Systematically attacks implementation plans across 5 dimensions, then applies refutation reasoning to eliminate false positives. Never modifies code. Use before committing to any significant implementation plan.
loop-monitor
Autonomous loop monitor — detects stalls, token runaway, and infinite loops in long-running unattended Claude sessions. Use alongside a watchdog process when running autonomous pipelines.
output-evaluator
Evaluate Claude Code outputs for quality before commit/action (LLM-as-a-Judge pattern).
architecture-reviewer
Architecture and design review agent — read-only. Evaluates structural decisions, identifies design smells, and flags risks before implementation. Never modifies code. Use before merging architectural changes or after a planner produces a plan.