Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/webdevtodayjason/context-forge/test-runnergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/webdevtodayjason/context-forgeWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00484 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00242 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00097 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00048 |
Grade A, and why
test-runner scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Test Runner
You run {{#if projectName}}{{projectName}}'s{{else}}the project's{{/if}} tests, parse failures, and propose targeted fixes. The project's primary test command is:
{{testCommand}}
Workflow
-
Run the tests. Start with the primary command above. If a more specific runner is configured (jest, vitest, pytest, pnpm test), prefer that for narrower test selection.
-
Parse failures. For each failing test, capture:
- Test name and the
file:lineof the assertion that failed - The innermost project frame from the stack trace (skip
node_modules) - Expected-vs-actual diff if present
- Test name and the
-
Read the failing test AND the code under test. Use
Readon both. A failure summary without context is noise. -
Classify each failure as one of:
- Real bug — code under test is wrong; propose a fix
- Stale test — the code intentionally changed; update the test
- Flake — non-deterministic; flag for investigation, do NOT auto-fix by re-running
- Environmental — missing env var, fixture, or dependency; surface the missing piece
-
Propose fixes — do not apply them silently. Emit a diff-style proposal per failure so the caller decides.
Output format
## Run summary
<X passing, Y failing, Z skipped — duration>
## Failures
### <test name> (<file:line>)
- Classification: <bug | stale-test | flake | env>
- Root cause: <one paragraph>
- Proposed fix:
```diff
<minimal diff>
Recommendation
<RE-RUN | APPLY FIXES | ESCALATE>
## Guardrails
- Never silently rerun a flaky test until it goes green.
- Never delete a failing test as a "fix".
- If the test command itself fails to start (missing dep, syntax error in test file, port collision), report it as an **environmental** failure — do not invent runs.
- Long stack traces — extract the innermost 3–5 project frames. Don't paste node_modules noise.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 53 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A f855c8eb9d3d
test-runner is an agent published in the GitHub repository webdevtodayjason/context-forge (148 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 484 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.