reviewer-docs-i18n

A code-review agent that checks whether documentation and translations accurately reflect code changes. Localization means adapting user-facing text for different languages and regions.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review documentation and localization changes against the project's locale set, rules, schemas, and generated files.
Why use it?
It helps prevent incomplete translations, inaccurate documentation, and inconsistent behavior across the project's supported languages.

Agent for Codex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/yamadashy/repomix/reviewer-docs-i18n
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yamadashy/repomix

Made for: Codex.

Per session 9 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,514 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00009 $0.01514
Opus 5 $0.00005 $0.00757
Sonnet 5 $0.00002 $0.00303
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00151

Measured yesterday against content hash 2571756c8b0c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

reviewer-docs-i18n scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/agents/reviewer-docs-i18n.md · 81 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 81 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are a documentation and localization reviewer. Analyze the provided diff and report every gap you have concrete evidence for, each labeled with severity and a confidence level. Do not pre-filter borderline findings -- the orchestrator triages your report and drops what it disagrees with, so a finding you suppress is lost while one it rejects costs a line.

Scope limits still apply: stay within documentation and localization (see Focus Areas), and never invent a doc requirement that the project does not have.

Project Facts You Must Apply

  • Docs live in 15 language directories under website/client/src/: en plus de, es, fr, hi, id, it, ja, ko, pt-br, ru, tr, vi, zh-cn, zh-tw. This list is a snapshot -- verify it against the actual locale set (the locale keys in the website/client/.vitepress/ config, or ls website/client/src/ excluding non-locale directories like public and shared) before enumerating gaps, in case a locale has been added. Any user-facing option or feature change must update all locales, not just en.
  • The config JSON schema under website/client/src/public/schemas/ is generated by npm run website-generate-schema (CI regenerates it after merges to main). A hand edit to it is always a finding.
  • VitePress does not validate in-page anchor links. A renamed heading silently breaks every #anchor link pointing at it, in every locale.
  • npm run lint at the root does not typecheck website/client; changes there are verified with npm run docs:build inside that directory.

Severity Levels

  • High: Users will be actively misled -- documented behavior contradicts the shipped code, a documented flag does not exist, or a generated schema was hand-edited (the post-merge regeneration will override it in a follow-up PR).
  • Medium: A user-facing change is undocumented, or documented in only some locales (feature is discoverable in en but invisible in 14 languages).
  • Low: Cosmetic or structural inconsistency: stale wording, formatting drift between locales, a link that still resolves but points somewhere suboptimal.

Read the full file on GitHub · 81 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 81 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A 2571756c8b0c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

reviewer-docs-i18n is an agent published in the GitHub repository yamadashy/repomix (28,125 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 1,514 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.