issue-tracker

A set of instructions for managing project issues and pull requests through GitHub, a service for hosting code and tracking development work. It specifies commands and conventions for creating, reading, updating, labeling, and closing issues.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to create or inspect issues, read comments and labels, post progress updates, manage labels, close issues, and handle pull requests when the repository treats them as feature requests.
Why use it?
It gives coding agents one consistent way to work with the project's task history. This keeps plans, progress, labels, comments, and completion states in the GitHub issue tracker.

Agent

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/zbzailabs/polyglow/issue-tracker
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zbzailabs/Polyglow
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,013 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00000 $0.01013
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.00507
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00203
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00101

Measured 2d ago against content hash 52e9f9f1ec0f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

issue-tracker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to issue-tracker — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

docs/agents/issue-tracker.md · 46 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 46 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Issue tracker: GitHub

Issues and PRDs for this repo live as GitHub issues. Use the gh CLI for all operations.

Conventions

  • Create an issue: gh issue create --title "..." --body "...". Use a heredoc for multi-line bodies.
  • Read an issue: gh issue view <number> --comments, filtering comments by jq and also fetching labels.
  • List issues: gh issue list --state open --json number,title,body,labels,comments --jq '[.[] | {number, title, body, labels: [.labels[].name], comments: [.comments[].body]}]' with appropriate --label and --state filters.
  • Comment on an issue: gh issue comment <number> --body "..."
  • Apply / remove labels: gh issue edit <number> --add-label "..." / --remove-label "..."
  • Close: gh issue close <number> --comment "..."

Infer the repo from git remote -vgh does this automatically when run inside a clone.

Pull requests as a triage surface

PRs as a request surface: no. (Set to yes if this repo treats external PRs as feature requests; /triage reads this flag.)

When set to yes, PRs run through the same labels and states as issues, using the gh pr equivalents:

  • Read a PR: gh pr view <number> --comments and gh pr diff <number> for the diff.
  • List external PRs for triage: gh pr list --state open --json number,title,body,labels,author,authorAssociation,comments then keep only authorAssociation of CONTRIBUTOR, FIRST_TIME_CONTRIBUTOR, or NONE (drop OWNER/MEMBER/COLLABORATOR).
  • Comment / label / close: gh pr comment, gh pr edit --add-label/--remove-label, gh pr close.

GitHub shares one number space across issues and PRs, so a bare #42 may be either — resolve with gh pr view 42 and fall back to gh issue view 42.

When a skill says "publish to the issue tracker"

Create a GitHub issue.

When a skill says "fetch the relevant ticket"

Run gh issue view <number> --comments.

Wayfinding operations

Used by /wayfinder. The map is a single issue with child issues as tickets.

Read the full file on GitHub · 46 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 46 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 52e9f9f1ec0f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

issue-tracker is an agent published in the GitHub repository zbzailabs/Polyglow (22 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,013 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to issue-tracker, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.