Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/ayoubben18/ab-method/create-taskgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ayoubben18/ab-methodWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00576 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00288 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00115 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00058 |
Grade A, and why
create-task scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 42 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Create Task
Description
Create a new task from a problem definition using the AB Method's incremental tasking workflow system.
Usage
/create-task
Behavior
Loads and executes the create-task workflow from .ab-method/core/create-task.md
This workflow will:
- Always invoke
grill-with-docsto interview the user (no skip — even when the request looks clear) - Read UBIQ + CONTEXT + tech-stack + patterns + ADRs to ground the task in canonical terms
- Write a slim
progress-tracker.mdwith all missions defined as one-line entries - Run
critique-planon the drafted missions — a read-only domain critic that pushes back only on genuine conflicts with the domain model (advisory; silent when the plan is sound) - Run every mission through the
tddskill (red-green-refactor) — no separate mission docs are created - Run
review-implementationafter the last mission — three critics (cleaner-architecture, slop-defender, reusability-inspector) on the task diff; interactive here, so findings are presented for you to apply
Workflow Details
- Always grill —
grill-with-docsruns on every invocation - Always TDD — every mission goes through the
tddskill; the test is the spec - No mission docs — missions live as one-line entries in
progress-tracker.md; tight technical summaries are appended on completion - Subagents only when warranted — direct implementation by default; pick agents by need (backend / UI / testing / quality / research), not by mission type
- Optional parallel groups — independent missions can be tagged
[pp-1],[pp-2], ... and run concurrently in subagents; untagged missions stay sequential and act as barriers. Strictly opt-in: the workflow always asks before tagging anything - Unresolved questions (rare) — a question you genuinely can't answer yet gets parked in
docs/tasks/<task>/unresolved-questions.mdwith an agreed placeholder, instead of stalling the task or letting the agent guess. Missions that build on one are marked⚠️ UQ-nand ship the placeholder behind a singleTODO(UQ-n)seam; answer it later and/extend-taskswaps it in
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 42 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 510e90bd05eb
create-task is a command published in the GitHub repository ayoubben18/ab-method (187 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 576 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.