Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/brainbytes-dev/everything-claude-finance/term-sheetgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/brainbytes-dev/everything-claude-financeWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00006 | $0.01338 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00669 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00268 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00134 |
Grade A, and why
term-sheet scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 128 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/term-sheet — Analyze Term Sheet
What This Command Does
Performs a detailed analysis of venture capital or growth equity term sheets. Evaluates each provision for market-standard compliance, identifies founder-friendly vs. investor-friendly terms, flags unusual or aggressive clauses, and provides negotiation guidance from the selected perspective.
When to Use
- Reviewing an incoming term sheet from an investor
- Drafting a term sheet for a new investment
- Comparing multiple term sheets from competing investors
- Educating founders on term sheet implications
- Preparing for term sheet negotiation
- Post-signing term sheet compliance review
How It Works
- Provision Mapping: Categorizes all terms into economic (valuation, liquidation, anti-dilution) and control (board, voting, protective provisions) buckets
- Market Comparison: Benchmarks each provision against market standards for the stage and geography
- Impact Analysis: Models the financial and governance impact of each material provision
- Red Flag Detection: Identifies terms that are unusual, aggressive, or potentially problematic
- Negotiation Guide: Suggests negotiation positions and fallback alternatives for each flagged term
Example Usage
Input:
/term-sheet stage:series-a perspective:both jurisdiction:US-DE
Output:
# Term Sheet Analysis — Series A
## Perspective: Balanced (Founder + Investor) | Jurisdiction: Delaware
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
## Economic Terms Assessment
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
| Provision | Term | Market Std | Assessment |
|--------------------------|-----------------|---------------|-----------------|
| Pre-money valuation | $12M | $10–15M | ✓ Market |
| Investment amount | $4M | $3–6M | ✓ Market |
| Liquidation preference | 1x non-part. | 1x non-part. | ✓ Market |
| Dividends | 8% non-cumul. | 6-8% non-cum. | ✓ Market |
| Anti-dilution | Broad WA | Broad WA | ✓ Market |
| Pay-to-play | None | Uncommon at A | ✓ Market |
| Option pool | 15% post-money | 10-15% | ⚠ High end |
### Economic Deep-Dive
**Liquidation Preference: 1x Non-Participating** ✓
- Founder view: Best-case scenario. Investor chooses preference OR conversion.
- Investor view: Standard. Provides downside protection without capping upside.
- Impact: At 3x exit, investor converts to common (better than 1x return).
**Option Pool: 15% Post-Money** ⚠
- Founder view: Pre-money option pool shuffle effectively reduces valuation.
15% post = $2.4M carved from founders' value. Negotiate down to 10-12%.
- Investor view: Ensures adequate equity for hiring plan without near-term dilution.
- Effective pre-money: $12M stated, but ~$10.2M after pool creation.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
## Control Terms Assessment
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
| Provision | Term | Market Std | Assessment |
|--------------------------|------------------|---------------|-----------------|
| Board composition | 2 founders, 1 inv, 1 ind | 2/1/1 | ✓ Market |
| Protective provisions | Standard list | Standard | ✓ Market |
| Drag-along | Majority pref + common | Standard | ✓ Market |
| Information rights | Monthly + quarterly | Standard | ✓ Market |
| Pro-rata rights | Major investors | Standard | ✓ Market |
| ROFR on secondary | Company + investor | Standard | ✓ Market |
| Founder vesting | 4yr/1yr cliff, reset | Negotiable | 🔴 Aggressive |
| No-shop | 45 days | 30-45 days | ⚠ High end |
### Control Deep-Dive
**Founder Vesting Reset** 🔴
- Founder view: CRITICAL — vesting reset means founders restart 4-year
vesting from scratch. Prior vesting is lost. Strong pushback warranted.
Counter: Credit time served, start from current vested position.
- Investor view: Ensures founder commitment post-investment.
- Recommendation: Compromise — credit 50% of time served, or use
acceleration triggers on change of control.
**No-Shop: 45 Days** ⚠
- Founder view: 30 days is more standard. 45 days limits negotiation leverage.
- Investor view: Adequate time for due diligence.
- Recommendation: Accept if due diligence is genuinely complex; otherwise push to 30.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
## Negotiation Priorities
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
| Priority | Issue | Ask | Fallback |
|----------|--------------------|------------------------------|-----------------|
| 1 | Founder vesting | Credit all time served | Credit 50% |
| 2 | Option pool size | Reduce to 10% post-money | 12% post-money |
| 3 | No-shop period | Reduce to 30 days | 35 days |
| 4 | Acceleration | Add double-trigger accel. | Single trigger |
### Overall Assessment: FAVORABLE with one critical issue (vesting reset).
Resolve vesting before signing. All other terms are market-standard.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 128 lines · 6 tokens per session scan A d0d67bf5c541
term-sheet is a command published in the GitHub repository brainbytes-dev/everything-claude-finance (5 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 6 tokens to every session and 1,338 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
git
Git operations with intelligent commit messages and workflow optimization.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
constitution
Create or update the project constitution from interactive or provided principle inputs.