evaluate

evaluate is a command for Claude Code from bvdr/claude-plugins. It costs 37 tokens per session (1,569 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A command that sends Claude Code's last answer, along with the original request, to Google's Gemini for an independent review. Gemini is Google's AI assistant.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to evaluate a response or specific context, provided you have a Gemini API key.
Why use it?
It gives you a second assessment when you want to check an answer, plan, or approach.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the bvdr plugin — 13 commands shipped together

Good fit Use it to evaluate a response or specific context, provided you have a Gemini API key.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/bvdr/claude-plugins/evaluate
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/bvdr/claude-plugins

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install bvdr, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 13 commands.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for evaluate

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/bvdr/claude-plugins/evaluate/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/bvdr/claude-plugins/evaluate)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/bvdr/claude-plugins/evaluate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/bvdr/claude-plugins/evaluate/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for evaluate

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/bvdr/claude-plugins/evaluate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/bvdr/claude-plugins/evaluate.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 37 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,569 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00037 $0.01569
Opus 5.5 $0.00015 $0.00628
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00007 $0.00314
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00157

Measured 1mo ago against content hash a811befd506f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

evaluate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/bvdr/commands/evaluate.md · 174 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 174 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Gemini Evaluate

Get an independent evaluation of Claude's last output from Google's Gemini.

Pre-flight

  1. Run echo $GEMINI_API_KEY in Bash
  2. If empty, tell the user:

    GEMINI_API_KEY is not set. Get one at https://aistudio.google.com/apikey and add to your shell config (~/.zshrc, ~/.bashrc, etc.):

    export GEMINI_API_KEY="your-key-here"
    
    Then stop.
  3. Optionally check echo $GEMINI_MODEL — defaults to gemini-pro-latest (always points to the latest stable Gemini Pro). User can override with any model name (e.g. gemini-3.1-pro-preview, gemini-2.5-pro, gemini-flash-latest).

What to Evaluate

Determine the content to evaluate:

  • If the user provided specific context (e.g. /evaluate this plan or /evaluate the migration approach) — use that specific content from the conversation
  • Otherwise — use YOUR (Claude's) last full assistant message before this skill was invoked

IMPORTANT: Always include BOTH the user's original request AND your response. Gemini cannot evaluate an answer without knowing the question. Format it as:

USER REQUEST:
<the user's message that prompted your response>

ASSISTANT RESPONSE:
<your response being evaluated>

Write the content to /tmp/gemini-eval-content.json as a JSON file using Node. This avoids all escaping issues:

node -e "
const fs = require('fs');
const content = fs.readFileSync('/dev/stdin', 'utf8');
fs.writeFileSync('/tmp/gemini-eval-content.json', JSON.stringify(content));
" << 'EVAL_INPUT_END'
<paste the user request + assistant response here>
EVAL_INPUT_END

If the content contains EVAL_INPUT_END, use Node to write it directly:

node -e "
const fs = require('fs');
fs.writeFileSync('/tmp/gemini-eval-content.json', JSON.stringify(\`<content here, backtick escaped>\`));
"

Call Gemini API

Run this Node script. It builds the prompt, calls the API, and writes the raw response to /tmp/gemini-eval-response.md:

node -e "
const https = require('https');
const fs = require('fs');

const apiKey = process.env.GEMINI_API_KEY || '';
const model = process.env.GEMINI_MODEL || 'gemini-pro-latest';

if (!apiKey) { console.error('Error: GEMINI_API_KEY not set'); process.exit(1); }

const content = JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync('/tmp/gemini-eval-content.json', 'utf8'));

const systemPrompt = \`You are an expert technical reviewer providing a second opinion on AI-generated output.

Evaluate the following content critically and constructively. Cover:

1. **Correctness** — Are there factual errors, wrong assumptions, or flawed logic?
2. **Completeness** — What's missing? Any blind spots or edge cases not addressed?
3. **Quality** — Is it well-structured, clear, and actionable?
4. **Risks** — Any potential issues, security concerns, or pitfalls?
5. **Suggestions** — Concrete improvements, alternatives, or things to reconsider.

Be direct. If it's good, say so briefly and focus on what could be better. If it's bad, explain why.

---

CONTENT TO EVALUATE:

\` + content;

const payload = JSON.stringify({
  contents: [{ parts: [{ text: systemPrompt }] }],
  generationConfig: { temperature: 0.7, maxOutputTokens: 32768 }
});

const url = new URL(\`https://generativelanguage.googleapis.com/v1beta/models/\${model}:generateContent?key=\${apiKey}\`);

const req = https.request({
  hostname: url.hostname,
  path: url.pathname + url.search,
  method: 'POST',
  headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json', 'Content-Length': Buffer.byteLength(payload) }
}, (res) => {
  let body = '';
  res.on('data', (chunk) => body += chunk);
  res.on('end', () => {
    try {
      const result = JSON.parse(body);
      if (result.error) {
        console.error('Gemini API error: ' + result.error.message);
        console.error('Tip: set GEMINI_MODEL to a current model like gemini-pro-latest or gemini-flash-latest.');
        process.exit(1);
      }
      const candidate = result.candidates && result.candidates[0];
      const text = candidate && candidate.content && candidate.content.parts && candidate.content.parts[0] && candidate.content.parts[0].text;
      if (!text) {
        const reason = candidate && candidate.finishReason;
        if (reason === 'MAX_TOKENS') {
          console.error('Gemini hit MAX_TOKENS before producing output (likely all tokens consumed by thinking). Increase maxOutputTokens or use a non-thinking model like gemini-flash-latest.');
        } else {
          console.error('Gemini returned no text. finishReason=' + reason + '. Raw: ' + body.slice(0, 500));
        }
        process.exit(1);
      }
      fs.writeFileSync('/tmp/gemini-eval-response.md', text);
      console.log('Gemini response saved to /tmp/gemini-eval-response.md (model: ' + (result.modelVersion || model) + ')');
    } catch (e) {
      console.error('Failed to parse response: ' + body.slice(0, 500));
      process.exit(1);
    }
  });
});
req.on('error', (e) => { console.error('Request failed: ' + e.message); process.exit(1); });
req.setTimeout(120000, () => { req.destroy(); console.error('Request timed out'); process.exit(1); });
req.write(payload);
req.end();
"

Read the full file on GitHub · 174 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 174 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A a811befd506f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

evaluate is a command published in the GitHub repository bvdr/claude-plugins (4 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 1,569 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.