Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Caspian-Sun/claude-code-workflow. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Caspian-Sun/claude-code-workflow/main/.claude/commands/plan.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Caspian-Sun/claude-code-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/caspian-sun/claude-code-workflow/plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/caspian-sun/claude-code-workflow/plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/caspian-sun/claude-code-workflow/plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/caspian-sun/claude-code-workflow/plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/caspian-sun/claude-code-workflow/plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01978 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00791 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00396 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00198 |
Grade A, and why
plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 155 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are now acting as a Software Architect. Based on the requirements I provide, complete the following:
Step 0: Locate the PRD (mandatory)
Task lists must be traceable to PRD anchors — otherwise the downstream /test command cannot generate tests from business rules.
-
Determine input type:
- Input is
@docs/prds/xxx.mdpath → read directly - Input is a text description → stop and ask the user:
- Does a corresponding PRD already exist? What is the path?
- If not, recommend running
/prd <requirement description>to generate a PRD draft first, then fill in all[TBD]items before coming back to run/plan
- Do not hardcode requirements without a PRD — the resulting
acceptanceCriteriawould be AI guesses, and tests would be wrong too
- Input is
-
Extract all H2 feature headings from the PRD as anchor sources for subsequent
prdReffields:Anchors extracted from docs/prds/user-list.md: - #search-form - #data-table - #bulk-delete -
If the PRD lacks a "Business Rules" section, prompt the user to fill it in before continuing (no rules = no reliable test generation)
-
Hard gate: invoke
/prd-checkfor completeness validation (stop if it fails)Must run
/prd-checkagainst the input PRD (defined in.claude/commands/prd-check.md) and get the result:- Pass → proceed to the "Analysis Steps"
- Fail → output the
/prd-checkerror content, terminate, do not proceed to task breakdown
How to run: as an embedded step in
/plan, run all 5 checks defined inprd-check.mdin full — same rules, output format, and blocking decisions. Do not re-implement the check logic, and do not downgrade or skip it.Why it's a separate command:
- Users can independently run
/prd-check @docs/prds/xxx.mdduring PRD review for real-time self-checking without needing to run/plan /planand/prd-checkshare the same check rules, avoiding divergence
Analysis Steps
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 155 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A e3f39cb5d49c
plan is a command published in the GitHub repository Caspian-Sun/claude-code-workflow (10 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,978 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
vibe-agents
Step 4 of the vibe-coding workflow: generate AGENTS.md + tool configs so the AI builder stays on track.
spark-prairie-fire
A command that applies the Spark Prairie Fire method to choose a starting point and a small first step for a new task. It produces an assessment, a three-step plan, and a check against spreading the work too widely.
fest-show
Show festival progression (in-progress tasks, roadmap, and dependency view).
upgrade
Keep dependencies current and the GitHub security tab clean — CVE fixes through pnpm overrides, red Dependabot PRs taken over, routine bumps landed, CodeQL alerts triaged. Autonomous by default, one PR per lane, asks nothing.
review
Review proposed ADRs for lifecycle progression — accept implemented decisions, deprecate stale ones, archive trivial ones.
from-spec
Extract Architecture Decision Records from a completed spec.