Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/christopher-buss/bedrock/issuegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/christopher-buss/bedrockWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00010 | $0.01172 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00586 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00234 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00117 |
Grade A, and why
issue scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
80% identical to cycle — 155 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 142 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Analyze GitHub issue and create TDD implementation plan.
Process:
- Get Issue Number
- Either from branch name use that issue number
- Patterns: issue-123, 123-feature, feature/123, fix/123
- Or from this bullet point with custom info: $ARGUMENTS
- If not found: ask user
- Fetch Issue
Use gh CLI to fetch the issue: gh issue view [ISSUE_NUMBER] --json
- Analyze and Plan
Summarize the issue and requirements, then:
Discovery Phase
Understand the requirement by asking (use AskUserQuestion if needed):
Problem Statement
- What problem does this solve?
- Who experiences this problem?
- What's the current pain point?
Desired Outcome
- What should happen after this is built?
- How will users interact with it?
- What does success look like?
Scope & Constraints
- What's in scope vs. out of scope?
- Any technical constraints?
- Dependencies on other systems/features?
Context Check
- Search codebase for related features/modules
- Check for existing test files that might be relevant
TDD Fundamentals
The TDD Cycle
The foundation of TDD is the Red-Green-Refactor cycle:
- Red Phase: Write ONE failing test that describes desired behavior
- The test must fail for the RIGHT reason (not syntax/import errors)
- Only one test at a time - this is critical for TDD discipline
- Exception: For browser-level tests or expensive setup (e.g., Storybook
*.stories.tsx), group multiple assertions within a single test block to avoid redundant setup - but only when adding assertions to an existing interaction flow. If new user interactions are required, still create a new test. Split files by category if they exceed ~1000 lines.
- Exception: For browser-level tests or expensive setup (e.g., Storybook
- Adding a single test to a test file is ALWAYS allowed - no prior test output needed
- Starting TDD for a new feature is always valid, even if test output shows unrelated work
- Avoid hard-coded timeouts both in form of sleep() or timeout: 5000 etc;
use proper async patterns (
waitFor,findBy*, event-based sync) instead and rely on global test configs for timeout settings
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 142 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A 231a96dc67d8
issue is a command published in the GitHub repository christopher-buss/bedrock (13 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 1,172 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 80% identical to cycle, differing in 155 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
sicario.verify
Run deterministic verification.
create-plan
Important: ALL phases must use checkmarks for their tasks. Each checkmark should correspond to a single commit. The checkmark should be marked - [x] in the same commit that completes the task. Phase tasks should be prefixed with parent phase number and letters (a, b, c, etc.).
sicario.controls
Generate or update docs/compliance/control-applicability.md.
sicario.assess
Assess the repository against SicarioSpec guardrails.
sicario.init
Initialize SicarioSpec files in the current repository.
sicario.review
Review the active spec, plan, tasks, staged changes, or branch for security and governance gaps.