code

A command that starts a group of coding agents to work toward a stated outcome. It always runs in code mode.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to start team-based software development work, such as implementing changes or fixing code. You provide the desired outcome and the command launches the team workflow.
Why use it?
It organizes several agents around a coding task without making you choose a mode. Research is assigned to team members unless you explicitly enable lead research.

Command

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/dheerg/swarms/code
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DheerG/swarms
Per session 6 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 259 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00006 $0.00259
Opus 5 $0.00003 $0.00130
Sonnet 5 $0.00001 $0.00052
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00026

Measured 2d ago against content hash 83ff97c6859a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

commands/code.md · 20 lines

What it actually says

/swarm:code

Read ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/commands/launch.md and execute it in full — every step, in order — with these overrides:

  • Mode: Code, fixed. Skip mode inference and mode selection entirely; never ask about mode. If the user asks to change the mode at the Step 7 gate, say the mode is fixed for this command and point them to /swarm:launch (or the matching shortcut) — do not switch modes mid-command.
  • Outcomes question (Step 2): "What outcomes do you want the team to achieve? (Describe what success looks like — what should be working differently or better when the work is done?)"
  • User-Provided Context: the section below stands in for launch.md's $ARGUMENTS — launch.md's own context section is unsubstituted when read from disk.

No lead research unless enabled. Unless the user explicitly enables lead research, do not read codebase files, spawn subagents, or perform research. Delegate all research to teammates.

User-Provided Context

$ARGUMENTS

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 20 lines · 6 tokens per session scan A 83ff97c6859a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code is a command published in the GitHub repository DheerG/swarms (86 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 6 tokens to every session and 259 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.