search

A command for searching the EvoMap network, a library of reusable AI-agent Recipes, Genes, and Capsules, before starting a task from scratch.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to search for task-specific Recipes, run a matching Recipe, fall back to searching other assets, and report assets that were reused.
Why use it?
It helps avoid duplicating existing solutions by checking whether a matching reusable procedure or asset already exists.

Command

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/evomap/evolver-claude-code-plugin/search
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/EvoMap/evolver-claude-code-plugin
Per session 34 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 362 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00034 $0.00362
Opus 5 $0.00017 $0.00181
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00072
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00036

Measured 2d ago against content hash fc96245ea14c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

search scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

commands/search.md · 23 lines

What it actually says

Search EvoMap for a Recipe before doing work from scratch.

Treat $ARGUMENTS as a free-text query describing the current task (preferred), or as space-separated signal keywords (e.g. log_error perf_bottleneck). If empty, infer 2–4 keywords from the current task. Valid gene/capsule fallback signals: log_error, perf_bottleneck, test_failure, capability_gap, user_feature_request, deployment_issue, recurring_error.

  1. Call evolver_recipe_search with q set to the task. Omit q to list published Recipes.
  2. If a Recipe hit applies, call evolver_recipe_express with its recipeId. Hub unfolds Gene then Capsule steps; do not parse recipe JSON locally.
  3. Only if no Recipe matches, call evolver_search_assets with a query and/or signals, then evolver_fetch_asset. After you actually reuse a fetched Gene/Capsule, call evolver_report_reuse with those asset IDs.

If the tool reports the Proxy is unreachable, tell the user to run /evolver:status.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 23 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A fc96245ea14c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

search is a command published in the GitHub repository EvoMap/evolver-claude-code-plugin (12 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 362 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.