status

A command that reports the current state of a feature's specification, implementation plan, review, and pull-request description.

In plain words
What is it for?
It helps track completed plan tasks, review coverage, and the next recommended workflow action.
Why use it?
It shows what documentation or implementation work is still missing and reduces the need to inspect each file separately.

Command

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/marcmallet/specforge/status
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/marcmallet/specforge
Per session 17 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 332 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00017 $0.00332
Opus 5 $0.00009 $0.00166
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00066
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00033

Measured yesterday against content hash 950571916be8, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

status scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

commands/status.md · 33 lines

What it actually says

You are showing the current status of a feature.

Specs directory

Read the project config at: @.claude/specforge/config.json

If the file exists, use the value of the specsDir field as the base directory. If the file does not exist, fall back to .claude/specforge/ inside the current project.

The full path for this ticket is: /$ARGUMENTS/

Read the following files if they exist:

  • Spec: /$ARGUMENTS/spec.md
  • Plan: /$ARGUMENTS/plan.md
  • Review: /$ARGUMENTS/review.md
  • PR: /$ARGUMENTS/pr.md

Output a summary showing:

  • Feature name and one-line description
  • Plan status: how many tasks are complete vs total, broken down by [backend], [frontend], [both]
  • Review status: if a review exists, show the requirement coverage summary
  • Next recommended action:
    • If no plan exists → suggest /specforge:plan $ARGUMENTS
    • If plan exists but no review → suggest /specforge:implement $ARGUMENTS
    • If review exists but no pr.md → suggest /specforge:pr $ARGUMENTS
    • If pr.md exists → feature is ready for PR creation
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 33 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 950571916be8

Subscribe to this mod's changes

status is a command published in the GitHub repository marcmallet/specforge (9 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 332 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.