Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/mktoronto/python-clean-architecture/diagnose-smellsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MKToronto/python-clean-architectureWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00430 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00215 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00086 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00043 |
Grade A, and why
diagnose-smells scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Scan the code at $ARGUMENTS (or the current working directory if no path given) for code smells and anti-patterns from the full smell catalog.
Process
-
Read the code — Find and read ALL Python files in the target path recursively.
-
Check for all smells — Scan each file against the smell categories:
Naming & Identity: Type abuse, vague identifiers, built-in shadowing, asymmetric naming Structural: Too many arguments, too many instance vars, redundant variables, parallel data structures, wrong data structure Behavioral: Boolean flags, deep nesting, tell-don't-ask violations, no-self methods, redefining concepts, missing composition Import & Module: Wildcard imports, hardwired dependencies, hardwired init sequences
-
Report each smell found:
- Smell name and category
- File and line
- Severity: Critical (design flaw) / Important (should fix) / Suggestion (consider fixing)
- Before — the offending code snippet
- After — the suggested fix
-
Summary — Show a table at the top:
Smell Diagnosis: 12 files scanned, 6 smells found ───────────────────────────────────────────────── Structural: Too Many Instance Vars 2 instances (Important) Behavioral: Boolean Flags 2 instances (Important) Naming: Vague Identifiers 1 instance (Suggestion) Import: Hardwired Dependencies 1 instance (Critical) -
Priority ordering — Report critical smells first, then important, then suggestions.
For detailed smell explanations and examples, consult:
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/clean-architecture/references/code-smells.md${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/clean-architecture/references/code-quality.md
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 42 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A 0ceb65116ddf
diagnose-smells is a command published in the GitHub repository MKToronto/python-clean-architecture (8 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 430 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
go-stack.bundb.setup
Instructions to setup the go-stack BunDB integration for database access, migration management, and the bundled DB CLI command.
go-stack.project-update
Compare the current project against the latest go-stack scaffold template and propose or apply updates (tasks, linters, dependencies, skills, provider patterns, security tooling) while preserving project-specific business logic and module identity.
go-stack.inertia.setup
Instructions to setup the go-stack Inertia.js integration for fullstack Go applications, including boot provider wiring and frontend workflow.
deploy
Build, test, deploy with staged rollout.
brand-setup
Configure a new brand profile with colors, fonts, logo, visual style, platforms, and compliance rules.
save
Save this conversation as a new or existing reusable context.