diagnose-smells

A code-review command that scans Python files for common design and maintenance problems, often called code smells or anti-patterns. It reports each finding with its location, severity, offending code, and a suggested improvement.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review a Python project or directory for issues such as vague names, deep nesting, too many arguments, hardwired dependencies, and wildcard imports.
Why use it?
It helps find code that may be difficult to understand, change, or test before those problems spread. It also turns broad review work into a consistent checklist.

Command

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/mktoronto/python-clean-architecture/diagnose-smells
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MKToronto/python-clean-architecture
Per session 15 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 430 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00015 $0.00430
Opus 5 $0.00008 $0.00215
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00086
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00043

Measured 2d ago against content hash 0ceb65116ddf, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

diagnose-smells scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

commands/diagnose-smells.md · 42 lines

What it actually says

Scan the code at $ARGUMENTS (or the current working directory if no path given) for code smells and anti-patterns from the full smell catalog.

Process

  1. Read the code — Find and read ALL Python files in the target path recursively.

  2. Check for all smells — Scan each file against the smell categories:

    Naming & Identity: Type abuse, vague identifiers, built-in shadowing, asymmetric naming Structural: Too many arguments, too many instance vars, redundant variables, parallel data structures, wrong data structure Behavioral: Boolean flags, deep nesting, tell-don't-ask violations, no-self methods, redefining concepts, missing composition Import & Module: Wildcard imports, hardwired dependencies, hardwired init sequences

  3. Report each smell found:

    • Smell name and category
    • File and line
    • Severity: Critical (design flaw) / Important (should fix) / Suggestion (consider fixing)
    • Before — the offending code snippet
    • After — the suggested fix
  4. Summary — Show a table at the top:

    Smell Diagnosis: 12 files scanned, 6 smells found
    ─────────────────────────────────────────────────
    Structural:  Too Many Instance Vars    2 instances  (Important)
    Behavioral:  Boolean Flags             2 instances  (Important)
    Naming:      Vague Identifiers         1 instance   (Suggestion)
    Import:      Hardwired Dependencies    1 instance   (Critical)
    
  5. Priority ordering — Report critical smells first, then important, then suggestions.

For detailed smell explanations and examples, consult:

  • ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/clean-architecture/references/code-smells.md
  • ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/clean-architecture/references/code-quality.md
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 42 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A 0ceb65116ddf

Subscribe to this mod's changes

diagnose-smells is a command published in the GitHub repository MKToronto/python-clean-architecture (8 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 430 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.