Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nicelight/DevRails-26Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/nicelight/devrails-26/exe)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/nicelight/devrails-26/exe"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/nicelight/devrails-26/exe/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/nicelight/devrails-26/exe"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/nicelight/devrails-26/exe.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.04553 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.01821 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00911 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00455 |
Grade A, and why
exe scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 371 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/exe - Execute one TASK
<input_contract>
Expected $ARGUMENTS: one concrete TASK-NNN-TN-FT-NNN-WN.
The caller has already selected this task. /exe never scans the queue or
chooses another task.
Require and resolve:
.memory-bank/tasks/index.jsonand exactly one matching indexed task record;.memory-bank/workflows/tier-policy.md#tier-obligations;#task-claim-and-dependency-ownership;#tier-classification-and-escalationonly when observed scope may require a higher tier,#closure-authorityonly for manual T0/T1 closure,#hard-write-boundaryonly when a boundary/alias is non-empty,#task-scoped-acceptance-evidencewhen its fields are populated, and#claim-linked-red--green-for-t2t3only for T2/T3;- the task's direct feature/REQ context needed to interpret its outcome;
- direct task-linked canonical SDD specs and executable constraints;
- current
boundary-map.mdmodule, dependency-graph, and contract blocks when the task changes or crosses a registered module boundary; - behavior specs only when linked in
source_artifactsand useful as non-authoritative examples.
For a product task whose feature is not FT-000, also require a positive Global
Backbone Planning Revision and the latest feature-specific
/review-tasks-plan APPROVE report with exact standalone
REVIEWED_PLANNING_REVISION: <N> equal to it. FT-000 keeps its dedicated
Foundation gate and does not use product task-plan review.
Use task purpose, success_outcome, anti_goals, source_artifacts,
normative_inputs, constraints, invariants, verification_targets,
evidence_required, and runtime_context when present. For T0/T1, do not load
broad global planning docs by default. For T2/T3, direct task-linked applicable
canonical specs are mandatory; feature links and spec-index.md alone are not
execution context.
Point-of-use preflight must confirm:
- index/file/ID resolution and matching ID tier/feature/wave segments;
- valid
tier: T0|T1|T2|T3and executable lifecycle state; - every dependency exists and is
done|done_for_prod; - dependency outcomes are authoritative prerequisites; execute only the selected task's owned outcome and integration delta;
- no recorded blocker or unresolved required gate in the resolved task context;
- success is observable from AC/REQ/spec/gates/verification targets;
- the selected task, its direct feature/REQ context, and direct task-linked canonical specs are mutually consistent;
- for a product task, its feature lacks
PLANNING_RECONCILIATION_REQUIREDand its reviewed and current Planning Revision are equal; - T2/T3 direct canonical coverage is applicable and concrete enough to avoid guessing shape, rules, errors, and verification;
- every current accepted
planned|readyT2/T3 task satisfies the prospective proof-path contract in tier policy; - actual work fits the semantic outcome/AC/REQ/spec boundary, tier, deliberate hard allowed/forbidden scopes, and stop conditions;
- when linked rules define architecture boundaries, the tactic keeps state changes and cross-module orchestration with their accepted owners, uses required public boundaries, preserves source-of-truth and dependency direction, creates no unaccepted cross-module contract or forbidden command/write bypass, and honors linked orchestration-placement rules;
- for a task that changes a provider, current graph traversal covers every affected consumer until a compatible contract stops propagation; uncovered consumers make the feature tasking surface stale;
- within an open domain-modeling choice, prefer the affected area's local style; material boundary or ownership changes use the existing operator-decision routes;
- before creating, moving, or renaming a project-authored source file, resolve
its applicable ownership, reuse, or tooling boundary; inspect the nearest
relevant local pattern and governing manifests, configuration, resolution,
or registration; preserve framework placement, required or reserved filename
parts, import/module identity, public path, package export, route, and build
target; apply
AGENTS.md#source-path-semanticswhen choosing its filename and complete path; - for an Alembic migration under an accepted linear topology, preflight may
resolve the current head transiently to set or verify the new revision's
direct
down_revision; do not propagate it as a repository-current-head assertion or update historical feature tests, and run the existing project-level graph contract unchanged; - the tier-required existing protocol is coherent, or every missing protocol file can be initialized from its framework-owned template before task start.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +1 lines 75298d5294a6
- 1mo ago First seen · 370 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 32c8e8dd1fad
exe is a command published in the GitHub repository nicelight/DevRails-26 (23 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 4,553 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.
speckit.bug.fix
Apply the remediation from a bug assessment and record what was changed.