A read-only command that runs an OpenCode review against the repository's current Git state. Git is a tool for tracking changes to code.

Use it to review staged, unstaged, untracked, or branch-to-branch changes and choose whether the review should wait in the foreground or run in the background.

It gives you an independent review of local changes while leaving the files untouched.

review — Command by skillsland

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods

npx agentmods add commands/skillsland/opencode-plugin-cc/review

Clone the repo

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/skillsland/opencode-plugin-cc

Per session 11 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.

When invoked 646 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.

Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.

Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.

Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

Model	Per session	Once invoked
Fable 5	$0.00011	$0.00646
Opus 5	$0.00005	$0.00323
Sonnet 5	$0.00002	$0.00129
Haiku 4.5	$0.00001	$0.00065

Measured yesterday against content hash 1bde9a8b6c64, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

commands/review.md · 66 lines

What it actually says

Run a read-only OpenCode review through the shared plugin runtime.

Raw slash-command arguments: $ARGUMENTS

Core constraint:

This command is review-only.
Do not fix issues, apply patches, or suggest that you are about to make changes.
Your only job is to run the review and return OpenCode's output verbatim to the user.

Execution mode rules:

If the raw arguments include --wait, do not ask. Run the review in the foreground.
If the raw arguments include --background, do not ask. Run the review in a Claude background task.
Otherwise, estimate the review size before asking:
- For working-tree review, start with git status --short --untracked-files=all.
- For working-tree review, inspect git diff --shortstat --cached and git diff --shortstat.
- For base-branch review, use git diff --shortstat <base>...HEAD.
- Treat untracked files or directories as reviewable work.
- Recommend waiting only when the scoped review is clearly tiny, roughly 1-2 files total.
- In every other case, including unclear size, recommend background.
Then use AskUserQuestion exactly once with two options, putting the recommended option first and suffixing its label with (Recommended):
- Wait for results
- Run in background

Argument handling:

Preserve the user's arguments exactly.
Do not strip --wait or --background yourself.
/opencode:review does not accept custom focus text. Use /opencode:adversarial-review for steerable review.
The companion script parses --wait and --background, but Claude Code's Bash(..., run_in_background: true) is what actually detaches the run.

Foreground flow:

Run:

node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/dist/scripts/opencode-companion.mjs" review "$ARGUMENTS"

Return the command stdout verbatim, exactly as-is.
Do not fix any issues mentioned in the review output.

Background flow:

Launch the review with Bash in the background:

Bash({
  command: `node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/dist/scripts/opencode-companion.mjs" review "$ARGUMENTS"`,
  description: "OpenCode review",
  run_in_background: true,
});

Do not call BashOutput or wait for completion in this turn.
After launching the command, tell the user: "OpenCode review started in the background. Check /opencode:status for progress."

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

yesterday First seen · 66 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A 1bde9a8b6c64

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review is a command published in the GitHub repository skillsland/opencode-plugin-cc (1 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 646 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Code review Git and workflow claude-code claude-code-plugin opencode

review

Getting it into your agent

What it costs to keep this loaded

Grade A, and why

Nothing flagged

What it actually says

What this file has done since we first saw it

Other commands, from other repositories

psm

plan-review

release

refresh-compare-pages

release

step-research