audit

A command for running one or all selected Whats.Going.On reviewers in dependency waves. The reviewers are defined by the project's audit materials.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to run a specified reviewer or the complete reviewer set, including the required evidence and handoff steps.
Why use it?
It provides a repeatable way to inspect a project against selected review questions and record the results in the correct audit files.

Command

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/wgo-audit/code/audit
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wgo-audit/code
Per session 20 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,448 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00020 $0.01448
Opus 5 $0.00010 $0.00724
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00290
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00145

Measured yesterday against content hash b2da42d176a8, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

commands/audit.md · 121 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 121 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

/audit

Invoke this as wgo:audit <reviewer-id>/wgo:audit all in Codex, /wgo:audit <reviewer-id>//wgo:audit all in Claude, or /wgo-audit <reviewer-id>//wgo-audit all in OpenCode.

Load and use the WGO skill. Resolve the newest dated audit root with its references/common/audit-root.md. Read and write only that root.

One Reviewer

With <reviewer-id>, confirm that reviewer is selected in audit-brief.md, then:

  1. Read the brief, the reviewer card, its relevant predecessor handoffs, and only named shared evidence packets and linked artifacts relevant to its question. Resolve the approved portable package locator from the brief to an absolute runtime path, verify its ID and version, and do not persist that runtime path. On a same-root resume, also read its prior open items and decision inventory/register before assigning an OI, ADR, or PDR ID.
  2. When the brief names automatic GitHub code repository sources, create or refresh github-history-and-hosted-ci.md before reviewing. It inspects the named repositories' accessible PRs, issues, Projects, Actions, releases, and history without another approval, and writes only an evidence packet.
  3. Inspect available evidence before selecting outputs; register reusable evidence and material access events. Run any other card-listed shared collector when it supports the question and its packet is absent or stale.
  4. Select the reviewer card's required outputs and any conditional output whose plain-language trigger is met. Do not create routine not-applicable rows.
  5. If the reviewer returns a qualifying mandate, acceptable-outcome, priority, or authority question, the coordinator asks it and records the answer before dependent work. The reviewer never contacts the auditor. Use a verification when proof of fact, access, or live state is required.
  6. Create selected artifacts from their templates, labelling uncertainty in the artifact. Record a concise omission and closure route only when a required or triggered output cannot responsibly be created.
  7. Run the one ephemeral artifact-quality review. Revise the selected outputs once; it never creates an audit artifact or a second approval step.
  8. Write the reviewer report, including zero or more evidence-linked decision insights when they meet the shared standard, and compact handoff; then update the checklist and material shared open items.

Read the full file on GitHub · 121 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 121 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A b2da42d176a8

Subscribe to this mod's changes

audit is a command published in the GitHub repository wgo-audit/code (2 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 1,448 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.