Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xcodethink/open-claude-code-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills/dev)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills/dev"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills/dev/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills/dev"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills/dev.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.00427 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00171 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00085 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00043 |
Grade A, and why
dev scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
自主开发模式
你现在进入自主开发模式。按以下流程执行：
1. 读取任务文件
读取当前项目的 tasks/current-task.md。如果不存在，提示用户先描述任务，然后创建该文件。
2. 执行规则
- 按步骤顺序执行，每完成一步立即更新
tasks/current-task.md的进度（勾选 checkbox + 写执行日志） - 每步完成后运行验证命令（文件中"每步验证命令"段落指定的命令）
- 遇到 bug 严格遵循 Bug 分析铁律：停下来 → 读错误 → 追数据流 → 全局搜索 → 找到根因 → 一次修复。把分析过程写入执行日志
- 遇到需要用户决策的问题，写入"待用户决策"段落，然后停止执行
- 不要偏离方案：只做 task.md 里列出的步骤，不要"顺便优化"
- 每完成 2-3 步检查一下是否还在正确方向上
3. 完成条件
所有验收条件都满足后：
- 在文件顶部状态改为"已完成"
- 写一段完成摘要
- 列出需要用户确认的事项（如果有）
4. 异常处理
- 连续 3 次修改同一文件仍未解决问题 → 写入"待用户决策"，停止
- 发现方案有缺陷需要调整 → 写入"待用户决策"，停止
- 不确定该用哪种技术方案 → 写入"待用户决策"，停止
现在开始：读取 tasks/current-task.md 并执行。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 37 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A f6183f7bc035
dev is a command published in the GitHub repository xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 427 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
workpm
A project-management workflow for coordinating multiple AI workers through five stages. It includes task assignment, shared activity logs, worker replacement, and final checks.
growth-seo
SEO audit and optimization for organic search ranking.
crear-skill
Crear, probar y mejorar skills de forma iterativa. Usa cuando el usuario dice "crear skill", "crear habilidad", "build skill", "create a skill", "skill development", "desarrollar skill", "nueva habilidad". Usa el workflow: draft → test → review → improve → repeat con evaluación cuantitativa y qualitative review.
iterate
Iteration delivery — delivery check + archive + commit & tag + bump version.
wcag-audit
Accessibility audit based on WCAG 2.1/2.2 and the axe-core reference.
growth-ab-test
Command "growth-ab-test" from christopherlouet/claude-base, covering growth-ab-test agent, context, objective, workflow and expected output.