Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add instructions/yyjeqhc/webcodex/agents-mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yyjeqhc/webcodexWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.02294 | $0.02294 |
| Opus 5 | $0.01147 | $0.01147 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00459 | $0.00459 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00229 | $0.00229 |
Grade A, and why
webcodex AGENTS.md scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 97 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
AGENTS.md — WebCodex Repository Guide
These are the always-on rules for ordinary repository work. Read only the linked sections needed for the current task. A deeper AGENTS.md governs its directory.
V1 active development
V2 development is paused; V1 is the active product line and is not feature-frozen. Ordinary V1 work may add explicitly requested capabilities as well as correctness, reliability, and test improvements. Keep changes focused and do not weaken safety, credential, process-tree, transport, durability, or boundedness contracts.
1. Verify and preserve
- Work only in the repository, worktree, and external target authorized by the user.
- At task start, verify the root, branch, HEAD, status, relevant changes, and recent history. Recheck only after a Git operation, an observed concurrent change, or before committing.
- Treat prompt hashes, paths, branches, and runtime state as expectations to verify, never as reasons to overwrite the actual repository.
- Preserve unrelated work. Do not reset, rebase, restore, clean, or rewrite history unless the user explicitly requests that operation.
- Inspect only the implementation, tests, documentation, and diff relevant to the task; do not bulk-read unrelated material.
2. Build the simplest useful product
- Optimize for a workflow that is simple, obvious, and easy to operate.
- Prefer the smallest direct solution. Add abstractions, configuration, modes, compatibility layers, or extension points only for a concrete current need or a demonstrated reliability problem.
- Do not build a general framework for one use case. Wait for a second concrete use case before extracting shared machinery.
- Do not design for hypothetical consumers, tenants, deployment scales, or trust boundaries that the product does not have.
- Protect real boundaries—credentials, public entry points, destructive actions, wrong-target execution, repository history, and published artifacts—without adding policy machinery for imaginary ones.
- A feature that introduces a new externally reachable authority, credential audience, or replaceable runtime target creates a concrete present boundary. Model it explicitly when reusing an existing scope, identity, or lease would broaden existing credentials or allow stale requests to retarget; fewer concepts is not a reason to collapse distinct authority.
- When two designs satisfy the current need, choose the one with fewer concepts, states, configuration paths, and maintenance costs.
- For model-facing execution, prefer structured process/argv and durable Job/observation primitives over shell-text orchestration. Keep shell as an escape hatch; structured lifecycle state is the source of truth for retry safety.
- Keep model-facing ToolSpec/OpenAPI operation descriptions concise and prefer 300 characters or fewer when semantics remain complete. Never delete necessary authority, retry, continuation, uncertainty, safety, or recovery semantics merely for brevity; the canonical tested hard ceiling is
MODEL_TOOL_DESCRIPTION_MAX_CHARS. - Treat demonstrated host features such as MCP App orchestration as optional adapters. Core execution and Job semantics must remain protocol-, UI-, transport-, and OS-neutral.
- Never assume a model-facing HTTP/MCP request has stable model-window or Workflow Session identity. Treat requests as stateless unless that exact adapter/protocol contract explicitly supplies a stable
ClientWindow. Stateless MCP 2026 must not derive hidden continuity fromMcp-Session-Id, connection state, credentials, project identity, or prior requests. Transport/audit/session correlation ids are not Workflow Session, model-context-retention, or authority proofs by themselves; use explicit durable identifiers from their owning domain. Connector Tasks, Workflow Sessions, durable Agents/Conversations, and future Agent Tasks are distinct identities and must not be inferred from one another.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 97 lines · 2,294 tokens per session scan A 71c5df07e05a
webcodex AGENTS.md is an instructions file published in the GitHub repository yyjeqhc/webcodex (199 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 2,294 tokens to every session, about $0.0115 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other instructions, from other repositories
openagent CLAUDE.md
Claude Code instructions for the-open-agent/openagent, covering claude.md, commands, architecture, backend (go / beego) and frontend (react).
awesome-ChatGPT-repositories CLAUDE.md
Instructions for taishi-i/awesome-ChatGPT-repositories, covering awesome-chatgpt-repositories — claude code guide, repository structure, plugin skill (when installed via /plugin), local standalone command (when repo is cloned) and compact data format (plugins/awesome-chatgpt-search/data/).
skybridge AGENTS.md
Instructions for alpic-ai/skybridge, covering agents guide, what is skybridge, monorepo layout, development and validation.
lobehub AGENTS.md
AGENTS.md instructions for lobehub/lobehub, covering lobehub development guidelines, tech stack, agent skills, project structure and spa routes and features.
lobehub GEMINI.md
Gemini CLI instructions for lobehub/lobehub: Please follow instructions @./AGENTS.md.
lobehub CLAUDE.md
Claude Code instructions for lobehub/lobehub, a project described as: 🤯 LobeHub is your Chief Agent Operator, organizing your agents into 7×24 operations by hiring, scheduling, and reporting on your entire AI team.