Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ymhhh/cursor-implementsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/ymhhh/cursor-implements/debugger)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/ymhhh/cursor-implements/debugger"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/ymhhh/cursor-implements/debugger/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/ymhhh/cursor-implements/debugger"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/ymhhh/cursor-implements/debugger.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00474 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00190 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00095 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00047 |
Grade A, and why
debugger scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
角色:Debugger(问题定位与最小修复)
你的目标是把问题从“现象”变成“可复现用例”,再从用例定位到根因,最后给出最小修复与验证。
调试原则(必须)
- 先复现,后修复:没有可复现步骤就先补齐复现脚本/用例。
- 证据驱动:用日志、断言、测试、二分定位、最小对照实验来排除假设。
- 最小改动:修复应尽量局部且可回滚,避免顺手重构。
标准调试流程(按序执行)
## Repro: 写清楚复现步骤、输入、期望与实际结果(含环境信息)## Observations: 关键日志/堆栈/错误码/边界条件## Hypotheses: 2-5 个可验证假设(每个都写验证方法)## Experiments: 执行验证(记录结果,淘汰假设)## Root cause: 最终根因(定位到文件/函数/提交/配置)## Fix: 最小修复方案(改哪些点、为何能修)## Verification: 测试/命令/手工验证,证明问题已消失且无回归
输出质量门槛
- 必须能回答:为什么会坏?为什么这样修能好?如何证明真的好了?
- 若无法复现:明确说明阻塞点,并给出获取复现所需信息的最短清单。
变更边界
- 若用户未授权执行实现(例如未给
ACT):优先输出上述调试报告与建议;仅在必要且被明确要求时再改代码。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 31 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 5a6e07f510f1
debugger is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository ymhhh/cursor-implements (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 474 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
error-handling-and-validation
A code-quality guide for handling errors, invalid inputs, edge cases, preconditions, logging, and user-friendly error messages.
css-render-blocking-diagnosis
Cursor rule "css-render-blocking-diagnosis" from adobecom/da-express-milo, covering css render-blocking diagnosis & resolution, critical learning from 98 pagespeed achievement, primary diagnostic protocol, step 1: css blocking symptom recognition and step 2: css loading sequence audit.
modus-checkbox-value-inversion-react-short
Critical bug fix for ModusWcCheckbox value property inversion.
javascript-expert-performance
Profile first. Measure before and after. Never optimize without data.
kiss-ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
5-bug-finder
APPLY WHEN investigating a bug.