coderabbit-fix-flow

A workflow for turning CodeRabbit code-review comments into targeted fixes. CodeRabbit is an automated tool that reviews code and reports possible problems.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after a plain-text CodeRabbit review to save the report, examine type or style problems, and implement fixes.
Why use it?
It organizes review feedback, analyzes the reported issues, and helps apply only the necessary changes.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/alchemiststudiosdotai/coderabbit-fix-flow-plugin/coderabbit-fix-flow
Any agent
npx skills add alchemiststudiosDOTai/coderabbit-fix-flow-plugin --skill coderabbit-fix-flow
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alchemiststudiosDOTai/coderabbit-fix-flow-plugin

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 54 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 963 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00054 $0.00963
Opus 5 $0.00027 $0.00481
Sonnet 5 $0.00011 $0.00193
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00096

Measured 2d ago against content hash 72f0e25e9827, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

coderabbit-fix-flow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/coderabbit-fix-flow/SKILL.md · 143 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 143 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

CodeRabbit Fix Flow

Overview

This skill automates the workflow of processing CodeRabbit code review feedback by saving the review output to a timestamped document, then using MCP tools (sequential thinking and Exa context) to analyze and implement fixes with minimal code changes.

When to Use

Use this skill immediately after running coderabbit --plain or when you have CodeRabbit feedback that needs systematic processing. The skill handles type safety issues, code style violations, and other CodeRabbit-identified problems.

Workflow

Step 1: Execute CodeRabbit Review

Run the CodeRabbit review command in plain text mode:

coderabbit --plain

Step 2: Save Feedback Document

Save the CodeRabbit output to a timestamped QA document:

  • Create file: memory-bank/qa/coderabbit/cr-qa-{timestamp}.md
  • Include the full CodeRabbit output in the document
  • Add YAML front matter with metadata:
    ---
    title: "CodeRabbit QA Review - {timestamp}"
    link: "cr-qa-{timestamp}"
    type: "qa"
    tags:
      - code-review
      - coderabbit
      - type-safety
    created_at: "{timestamp}"
    updated_at: "{timestamp}"
    uuid: "{generate-uuid}"
    ---
    

Step 3: Analyze Issues with Sequential Thinking

Use the sequential thinking MCP tool to analyze all identified issues:

  1. Categorize issues by type (type safety, performance, style, security)
  2. Prioritize fixes (critical runtime issues first, then documentation)
  3. Plan minimal changes to achieve the fixes
  4. Identify dependencies between issues

Step 4: Get Best Practices Context

Use the Exa code context MCP tool to research current best practices for each issue type:

  • For type issues: "TypeScript type guards runtime validation best practices"
  • For Python type issues: "Python type annotations Optional None best practices"
  • For performance: "Performance optimization best practices [language]"
  • For security: "Security vulnerability fixes [language]"

Step 5: Implement Fixes Systematically

Read the full file on GitHub · 143 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 143 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A 72f0e25e9827

Subscribe to this mod's changes

coderabbit-fix-flow is a skill published in the GitHub repository alchemiststudiosDOTai/coderabbit-fix-flow-plugin (4 stars, last pushed 10mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 963 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

babysit-pr

Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep…

openai/codex · 114 tokens

imagegen

Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output…

openai/codex · 113 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens

next-cache-components-optimizer

Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…

vercel/next.js · 170 tokens