active-memory-reminder

A reminder system for preserving important decisions during long coding-agent sessions. It stores a human-readable progress note and a machine-readable JSON list of decisions so both can be read when a session resumes.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it at session start and after compaction to recover project context. It is for workflows that use files such as claude-progress.txt and claude-decisions.json.
Why use it?
Session summarization can preserve what happened while losing why choices were made. The decision file keeps specific trade-offs and rejected options available after the conversation is shortened or restarted.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/archive228/loopkit/active-memory-reminder
Any agent
npx skills add Archive228/loopkit --skill active-memory-reminder
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Archive228/loopkit

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 44 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,097 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00044 $0.01097
Opus 5 $0.00022 $0.00549
Sonnet 5 $0.00009 $0.00219
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00110

Measured 2d ago against content hash 5bf20ce5acd0, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

active-memory-reminder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/active-memory-reminder/SKILL.md · 56 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 56 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Active Memory Reminder

Loopkit splits shift-notes across two files on purpose:

  • claude-progress.txt — free-form prose. Human-readable narrative of what the last session did, what is in flight, what to pick up next. Wins for context and intent. Loses when the model needs to decide whether a decision was made.
  • claude-decisions.json — machine-readable array of {ts, decision} entries, appended by the loopkit pre-compact hook every time the transcript is about to be compacted. Wins for durability of specific choices ("chose Postgres over SQLite because…", "rejected the polling approach", "tried htmx and switched to Alpine").

Compaction is where reasoning dies. The summarizer keeps the shape of the work but strips the why. claude-decisions.json is the durable side-channel that survives that. This is the same pattern Meta's NapMem paper calls out for behavioral-state-decay in long-running agents: prose degrades faster than structured facts because the model rewrites prose freely and edits structured data carefully (also why loopkit uses JSON for feature_list.json; see [[feature-list-json]]).

When to apply

  • Session start / post-/clear / post-compact. Read claude-decisions.json right after claude-progress.txt and before you look at code. If both files disagree, the JSON is the more recent hard record of a specific choice; the prose gives you the reason.
  • Before re-litigating a design choice. If you're about to propose "let's use X instead of Y," grep claude-decisions.json first. If a prior session already rejected X and wrote it down, don't burn the token budget re-deriving that.
  • When picking up mid-implementation work. Decisions frame constraints the progress file may not restate.

File contract

claude-decisions.json is a JSON array. Every entry is {ts, decision}:

[
  {"ts": "2026-07-14T18:22:09Z", "decision": "chose Playwright MCP over Puppeteer because Puppeteer's alert-modal blind spot bit us in run 41"},
  {"ts": "2026-07-14T20:04:11Z", "decision": "rejected the daemon-per-project approach; switched to a single supervisor with per-project subdirs"},
  {"ts": "2026-07-15T09:31:44Z", "decision": "tried and failed to cache the plan across sessions — plan went stale within two sessions, dropped"}
]

Read the full file on GitHub · 56 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 56 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 5bf20ce5acd0

Subscribe to this mod's changes

active-memory-reminder is a skill published in the GitHub repository Archive228/loopkit (753 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 1,097 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

babysit-pr

Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep…

openai/codex · 114 tokens

imagegen

Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output…

openai/codex · 113 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens

next-cache-components-optimizer

Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…

vercel/next.js · 170 tokens