Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/arittr/spectacular/executing-parallel-phasenpx skills add arittr/spectacular --skill executing-parallel-phasegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/arittr/spectacularWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00056 | $0.11673 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.05837 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.02335 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.01167 |
Grade A, and why
executing-parallel-phase scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 1,278 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Executing Parallel Phase
Overview
Parallel phases enable TRUE concurrent execution via isolated git worktrees, not just logical independence.
Critical distinction: Worktrees are not an optimization to prevent file conflicts. They're the ARCHITECTURE that enables multiple subagents to work simultaneously.
When to Use
Use this skill when execute command encounters a phase marked "Parallel" in plan.md:
- ✅ Always use for N≥2 tasks
- ✅ Always use for N=1 (maintains architecture consistency)
- ✅ Even when files don't overlap
- ✅ Even under time pressure
- ✅ Even with disk space pressure
Never skip worktrees for parallel phases. No exceptions.
The Iron Law
PARALLEL PHASE = WORKTREES + SUBAGENTS
Violations of this law:
- ❌ Execute in main worktree ("files don't overlap")
- ❌ Skip worktrees for N=1 ("basically sequential")
- ❌ Use sequential strategy ("simpler")
All of these destroy the parallel execution architecture.
Multi-Repo Support
Receiving Multi-Repo Context
The orchestrator passes this context for multi-repo execution:
WORKSPACE_MODE: "multi-repo" or "single-repo"WORKSPACE_ROOT: Absolute path to workspace- Per-task
TASK_REPOfrom plan
Multi-Repo Worktree Creation
In multi-repo mode, create worktrees INSIDE each task's repo:
Single-repo (current):
git worktree add .worktrees/${RUN_ID}-task-${PHASE}-${TASK} ...
Multi-repo (new):
# Worktree goes inside the task's repo
cd ${TASK_REPO}
git worktree add .worktrees/${RUN_ID}-task-${PHASE}-${TASK} ...
cd ${WORKSPACE_ROOT}
Per-Repo Setup Commands
In multi-repo mode, read setup commands from each task's repo:
# Single-repo: Read from project root CLAUDE.md
INSTALL_CMD=$(grep -A1 "**install**:" CLAUDE.md | tail -1)
# Multi-repo: Read from task's repo CLAUDE.md
INSTALL_CMD=$(grep -A1 "**install**:" ${TASK_REPO}/CLAUDE.md | tail -1)
Per-Repo Constitution
Pass the correct constitution path to subagents:
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 1,278 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A fd53492ae8b4
executing-parallel-phase is a skill published in the GitHub repository arittr/spectacular (20 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 11,673 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
agent-host-chat-contributions
Build and review cross-cutting agent-host chat behavior through lifecycle contributions. Use when adding turn lifecycle side effects, prompt or context injection, restored-history transformation, protocol-action observation, or when reviewing changes that add code to AgentSideEffects or AgentService.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.