code-quality

A code-review workflow that checks a software project’s real quality gates, such as type checking and linting, then reports what they find.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to audit a codebase, run its checks, review type safety and duplication, and report findings. It applies fixes only when explicitly requested.
Why use it?
It replaces opinions based only on reading code with results from the project’s own checks. It also highlights weak typing, duplicated code, and other quality risks.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/automagik-dev/genie/code-quality
Any agent
npx skills add automagik-dev/genie --skill code-quality
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/automagik-dev/genie

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 54 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,219 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00054 $0.01219
Opus 5 $0.00027 $0.00609
Sonnet 5 $0.00011 $0.00244
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00122

Measured 2d ago against content hash 8e2056e80fe0, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-quality scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/genie/skills/code-quality/SKILL.md · 54 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 54 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Code Quality Review

Runtime syntax: invoke the plugin copy through the active runtime's owner-qualified skill selector; use a bare selector only when intentionally selecting a user-tier copy (a separately installed personal copy; Genie no longer seeds this tier). Cross-skill prose below uses bare names as portable semantic routes; the orchestrator resolves the selector for the active runtime.

Lens

This lane treats the type system as the cheapest, fastest reviewer on the team: a codebase's quality is measured by how much of its correctness the compiler can prove. Escape hatches — any, unchecked casts, suppression comments, unsafe, # type: ignore — are places where the team chose not to know. Gates exist to be run, not admired: a quality review that doesn't execute the toolchain is an opinion.

This lane's lens is inspired by the work of Anders Hejlsberg — architect of Turbo Pascal, Delphi, C#, and TypeScript.

Mandate

Assess and report by default. Apply changes only when the invocation explicitly asks. Never assess from reading alone when a gate exists — run it and report its actual output. Findings outside this lane (architecture judgment, test gaps, performance) get a one-line handoff to the relevant lane skill under skills/. When you have enough information to act, act.

Discover the Ground Truth First

Every repo defines its own gates; find them before running anything. Read the package manifest scripts, Makefile/justfile, CI workflows, and CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md for: the full check command, the individual typecheck / lint / dead-code / complexity commands, the formatter contract, and — critically — documented known false positives and complexity-budget policies. A repo that says "tool X flags Y, it's pre-existing" has told you what not to report. Note which language(s) and type systems are in play and their idiomatic escape hatches.

Genie-framework repos: check .genie/ for quality-related wishes (e.g. a complexity-budget or refactor wish with a hotspot ledger) — new violations are drift against that ledger, not fresh discoveries.

Read the full file on GitHub · 54 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 54 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A 8e2056e80fe0

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-quality is a skill published in the GitHub repository automagik-dev/genie (334 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 1,219 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories