documentdb-sharding

Guidance on splitting an Azure DocumentDB collection across multiple machines, a process called sharding. It explains when to use one machine, how to choose the field used to distribute records, and how to diagnose uneven load.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when planning DocumentDB capacity, selecting a shard key, deciding whether to scale out, or investigating hot partitions.
Why use it?
It helps avoid unnecessary cross-machine work and prevents one overloaded partition from limiting the whole database.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/azure/documentdb-agent-kit/sharding
Any agent
npx skills add Azure/documentdb-agent-kit --skill sharding
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Azure/documentdb-agent-kit

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 108 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 968 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00108 $0.00968
Opus 5 $0.00054 $0.00484
Sonnet 5 $0.00022 $0.00194
Haiku 4.5 $0.00011 $0.00097

Measured 2d ago against content hash b218c3e7f21a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

documentdb-sharding scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/sharding/SKILL.md · 42 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 42 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Sharding — Azure DocumentDB

Azure DocumentDB shards collections horizontally by hashing a shard key from each document and bucketing documents into logical shards, which the service then maps onto physical shards (the actual nodes that store data and serve traffic). The service hides the placement: you pick a shard key, the service handles the hash range and rebalancing.

The decisions that you own:

  1. Whether to shard at all. Sharding is not the default and is not always the right answer — single-shard clusters scale up vertically and avoid the cross-shard tax.
  2. What to shard on. The shard key is the single biggest determinant of long-term performance. It can be changed later (sh.reshardCollection), but only at significant cost once the collection is large.
  3. How big each physical shard should be. The cluster tier and storage SKU set the CPU / memory / IOPS budget per physical shard, and that's what your shard key needs to fit inside.

Rules

  • sharding-when-to-shard — Default to single-shard. Shard only when a collection's storage or transaction volume can exceed one physical shard's budget (e.g., > 32 TB on the largest storage SKU). Sharded and unsharded collections can coexist.
  • sharding-shard-key-selection — Read-heavy → pick the most frequent query filter to localize to one physical shard. Write-heavy → pick the highest-cardinality, evenly-distributed field. Avoid hot keys (monotonic IDs, timestamps, tenant IDs with skew).
  • sharding-logical-vs-physical — Mental model: logical shards are unbounded in count and size; physical shards are bounded by the cluster's compute/storage budget. Multiple logical shards map to one physical shard, never the reverse. Cross-shard transactions are supported but not free.
  • sharding-scaling-out-vs-up — Scale up (bigger tier / storage SKU) grows per-shard capacity without rebalancing; scale out (more physical shards) rebalances logical shards across the new layout. Read-heavy benefits from a bigger tier; write-heavy benefits from more shards or a bigger storage SKU.
  • sharding-hot-partition-diagnosis — Symptoms (uneven CPU / IOPS / storage across shards) and remediation: reshard, change the key, or add a secondary high-cardinality field.
  • sharding-how-to-commandssh.shardCollection / db.adminCommand({ shardCollection: "db.collection", key: {...} }), sh.reshardCollection, and the requirement to create an explicit index on the shard key (with enableLargeIndexKeys: true).
  • sharding-logical-shard-size-budget — Keep individual logical shards below 4 TB for best performance, even though the service imposes no hard cap.

Read the full file on GitHub · 42 lines

Files

What ships with it

7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 42 lines · 108 tokens per session scan A b218c3e7f21a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

documentdb-sharding is a skill published in the GitHub repository Azure/documentdb-agent-kit (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 108 tokens to every session and 968 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

babysit-pr

Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep…

openai/codex · 114 tokens

imagegen

Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output…

openai/codex · 113 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens

next-cache-components-optimizer

Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…

vercel/next.js · 170 tokens