requesting-code-review

A workflow for sending completed implementation work to a code reviewer before merging it. It is also intended for major features, completed tasks, and difficult fixes.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after implementing a feature, finishing a task, fixing a complex bug, or preparing changes for merge.
Why use it?
It provides an extra check for requirement gaps and defects before changes become part of the main codebase.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/blazity/nextjs-migration-plugin/requesting-code-review
Any agent
npx skills add Blazity/nextjs-migration-plugin --skill requesting-code-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Blazity/nextjs-migration-plugin

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 22 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 683 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 83% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00022 $0.00683
Opus 5 $0.00011 $0.00342
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00137
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00068

Measured yesterday against content hash 1d362fb24057, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

requesting-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

83% identical to requesting-code-review — 36 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.ai/skills/requesting-code-review/SKILL.md · 106 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 106 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Requesting Code Review

Dispatch superpowers:code-reviewer subagent to catch issues before they cascade. The reviewer gets precisely crafted context for evaluation — never your session's history. This keeps the reviewer focused on the work product, not your thought process, and preserves your own context for continued work.

Core principle: Review early, review often.

When to Request Review

Mandatory:

  • After each task in subagent-driven development
  • After completing major feature
  • Before merge to main

Optional but valuable:

  • When stuck (fresh perspective)
  • Before refactoring (baseline check)
  • After fixing complex bug

How to Request

1. Get git SHAs:

BASE_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD~1)  # or origin/main
HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)

2. Dispatch code-reviewer subagent:

Use Task tool with superpowers:code-reviewer type, fill template at code-reviewer.md

Placeholders:

  • {WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED} - What you just built
  • {PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS} - What it should do
  • {BASE_SHA} - Starting commit
  • {HEAD_SHA} - Ending commit
  • {DESCRIPTION} - Brief summary

3. Act on feedback:

  • Fix Critical issues immediately
  • Fix Important issues before proceeding
  • Note Minor issues for later
  • Push back if reviewer is wrong (with reasoning)

Example

[Just completed Task 2: Add verification function]

You: Let me request code review before proceeding.

BASE_SHA=$(git log --oneline | grep "Task 1" | head -1 | awk '{print $1}')
HEAD_SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)

[Dispatch superpowers:code-reviewer subagent]
  WHAT_WAS_IMPLEMENTED: Verification and repair functions for conversation index
  PLAN_OR_REQUIREMENTS: Task 2 from .ai/plans/deployment-plan.md
  BASE_SHA: a7981ec
  HEAD_SHA: 3df7661
  DESCRIPTION: Added verifyIndex() and repairIndex() with 4 issue types

[Subagent returns]:
  Strengths: Clean architecture, real tests
  Issues:
    Important: Missing progress indicators
    Minor: Magic number (100) for reporting interval
  Assessment: Ready to proceed

You: [Fix progress indicators]
[Continue to Task 3]

Read the full file on GitHub · 106 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 106 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 1d362fb24057

Subscribe to this mod's changes

requesting-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Blazity/nextjs-migration-plugin (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 683 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 83% identical to requesting-code-review, differing in 36 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

arcgis-to-portaljs

Migrate a whole ArcGIS Hub site into a PortalJS Arc portal end-to-end. Harvests the Hub /data.json (DCAT-US) inventory, exports every FeatureService layer through the ArcGIS REST query API with resultOffset paging, converts each to the serverless dual tier (PMTiles render + GeoParquet query) with tabular items to…

datopian/portaljs · 134 tokens

portaljs-migrate

Migrate (harvest) datasets between open-data platforms. Reads CKAN, a DCAT-US /data.json catalog (DKAN, ArcGIS Hub, data.gov), a DCAT / DCAT-AP RDF feed (JSON-LD, Turtle, or RDF/XML), Socrata, OpenDataSoft, or an ArcGIS FeatureServer, and writes them to a static PortalJS catalog or pushes them into a CKAN instance…

datopian/portaljs · 122 tokens

nextjs-upgrade

Next.js version migrations using official guides and codemods. Use when migrating a Next.js project to a new major version using codemods.

FilippoDeSilva/skills · 34 tokens

migrate-radix-to-base

Migrates React projects and components from Radix UI to Base UI. Use when asked to migrate from radix, move to base-ui, convert radix primitives, or switch a shadcn project's base library. Handles single components ("migrate accordion") and whole projects.

shadcn-ui/ui · 61 tokens

nextjs-pages-router

Set up tRPC in Next.js Pages Router with createNextApiHandler, createTRPCNext, withTRPC HOC, SSR via ssr option and ssrPrepass, SSG via createServerSideHelpers with getStaticProps, and server-side helpers for getServerSideProps prefetching.

trpc/trpc · 67 tokens

non-json-content-types

Handle FormData, file uploads, Blob, Uint8Array, and ReadableStream inputs in tRPC mutations. Use octetInputParser from @trpc/server/http for binary data. Route non-JSON requests with splitLink and isNonJsonSerializable() from @trpc/client. FormData and binary inputs only work with mutations (POST).

trpc/trpc · 75 tokens